2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of septic non-union of the tibia by the induced membrane technique. What factors could improve results?

Abstract: IV, Retrospective study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyzed the related factors involved in the bone union time and improvement of function of the lower extremities, which was defined as the difference between LEFS measured before first stage and about 1 year after the third stage, and discovered that defect size, type of bone graft, debridement times, and spacer-placing time did not influence bone union time or the change in LEFS after 1 year of the third stage. The findings were previously reported [3,33,34. The bone union time and improvement of lower-extremities function in a limited time were more affected by age, duration of infected bone defects, active smoking, and final fixation method in our series.…”
Section: What Factors Influence the Outcomes Of Treatment?supporting
confidence: 87%
“…We analyzed the related factors involved in the bone union time and improvement of function of the lower extremities, which was defined as the difference between LEFS measured before first stage and about 1 year after the third stage, and discovered that defect size, type of bone graft, debridement times, and spacer-placing time did not influence bone union time or the change in LEFS after 1 year of the third stage. The findings were previously reported [3,33,34. The bone union time and improvement of lower-extremities function in a limited time were more affected by age, duration of infected bone defects, active smoking, and final fixation method in our series.…”
Section: What Factors Influence the Outcomes Of Treatment?supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Some clues explaining the complications and failures in IMT are provided in the literature. Data from several sources highlight either the recurrence of sepsis, active smoking, or lack of rigid fixation after the second operative step as participants in IMT clinical failures [13][14][15][16]. However, available studies in the area are, to date, either prospective or retrospective epidemiologic studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the first phase of Masquelet, the bone defects filling with bone cement (polymethyl methacrylate, PMMA) spacer are fixed with internal plate, intramedullary nail, external fixator, casting, or nothing 12 , 17 , 19 – 21 . But it is not sure that which fixation method is more appropriate for membrane formation in the first stage of Masquelet 13 , 22 – 24 . It is known that the stiffness of fixation construct directly affects the fretting of fracture fragments, subsequently impacts the healing of bone fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%