2016
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries

Abstract: This guideline consists of three conditional evidence-based recommendations. First, we conditionally recommend proximal diversion for management of these injuries. Second, we conditionally recommend the avoidance of routine presacral drains and distal rectal washout in the management of these injuries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial evaluation of any trauma patient should follow ATLS principles, where anorectal injuries are asses during the secondary survey, where digital rectal examination is mandatory but has a low value in detecting rectal injuries. 2,4 Besides localization of the injury (intra or extraperitoneal), traumatic rectal injuries are classified according to the American Association of the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Rectum Injury Scale (Table 1), as they have to be defined as destructive or non-destructive injuries 5,6 ; however the operative decision making depends more on other factors such as: hemodynamic stability, concomitant lesions, degree of contamination and location of the injury. 7 Extraperitoneal injuries are associated with higher morbidity and mortality due to delays in diagnosis, difficulty in obtaining adequate exposure and inconsistencies in suggested methods of treatment, that affect outcomes negatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial evaluation of any trauma patient should follow ATLS principles, where anorectal injuries are asses during the secondary survey, where digital rectal examination is mandatory but has a low value in detecting rectal injuries. 2,4 Besides localization of the injury (intra or extraperitoneal), traumatic rectal injuries are classified according to the American Association of the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Rectum Injury Scale (Table 1), as they have to be defined as destructive or non-destructive injuries 5,6 ; however the operative decision making depends more on other factors such as: hemodynamic stability, concomitant lesions, degree of contamination and location of the injury. 7 Extraperitoneal injuries are associated with higher morbidity and mortality due to delays in diagnosis, difficulty in obtaining adequate exposure and inconsistencies in suggested methods of treatment, that affect outcomes negatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available data suggests that the use of a presacral drainage leads to an increase in mortality and infectious complications. 2,5 In 2016, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma guidelines recommend against the use of presacral drains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Management of Trauma (EAST) provide further rectal trauma management points [13]. This group conducted a systematic review of the literature from 1900 through 2014 for studies pertaining to penetrating, non-destructive extraperitoneal rectal injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of patients with high energy blunt trauma, a wide pubic symphysis, associated urogenital injuries and pelvic fractures (especially anteroposterior fractures by compression) should raise suspicion and guide further evaluation for concomitant rectal injuries 11 . Suspected rectal injuries must be evaluated through digital rectal examination, CT-Scan or proctoscopy if the patient´s hemodynamic status allows it 12 .…”
Section: Initial Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%