2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
299
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 479 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
299
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible reason for the low permeation of the 2005 JGES guidelines might be the publishing of the 2009 ASGE guidelines [16], but there were no similar clinical studies concerning the management of antithrombotic agents for EGD before the 2009 ASGE guidelines were published that can be compared with our study. Only 1 study about the management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopy before the 2009 ASGE guidelines were published was reported by Ono et al [17], but the participating patients included not only patients who underwent scheduled EGD, but also patients who underwent colonoscopy, EUS, and invasive procedures (EMR, ESD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possible reason for the low permeation of the 2005 JGES guidelines might be the publishing of the 2009 ASGE guidelines [16], but there were no similar clinical studies concerning the management of antithrombotic agents for EGD before the 2009 ASGE guidelines were published that can be compared with our study. Only 1 study about the management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopy before the 2009 ASGE guidelines were published was reported by Ono et al [17], but the participating patients included not only patients who underwent scheduled EGD, but also patients who underwent colonoscopy, EUS, and invasive procedures (EMR, ESD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The feature of these guidelines is that the risk of procedure-related bleeding is more heavily weighted than the risk of a thromboembolism caused by ceasing these medications, based on the solitary study [11]. In these guidelines, cessation is recommended even for scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) including biopsy, although cessation is not indicated as necessary in most western guidelines [12][13][14][15][16]. This difference was based on racial differences in bleeding risk between Asians and Caucasians as mentioned in the 2005 JGES guidelines [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommends continuing aspirin and NSAIDs if one of them is used alone and if its use is necessary [24][25][26][27]. However, there is some evidence that combination of aspirin with one or more NSAIDs may increase the risk of bleeding after polypectomy; therefore discontinuation of NSIADs 2-3 days before polypectomy is recommended in patients receiving aspirin [24][25][26][27]. Also, use of clopidogrel alone does not increase risk of postpolypectomy bleeding; however, concomitant use of aspirin or any other NSAIDs increases the risk of bleeding [3,24,25,28].…”
Section: Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-procedure warfarin use increases risk of bleeding after colonoscopy, thus discontinuation of warfarin is recommended 3-5 days before colonoscopy, however bridging with hepa-rin or its equivalents is important in high risk patients for thrombosis such as a mechanical cardiac valve [3,14,24,25,29].…”
Section: Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesar de la importancia de este tema, no se han realizado estudios prospectivos o controlados que permitan formular protocolos para la realización de las diversas técnicas endoscópicas diagnósticas o terapéuticas en pacientes con terapia antiembólica, pero sí existen muchas guías de manejo formuladas por las más importantes sociedades científicas que orientan en la atención de este tipo de pacientes (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified