Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigation.

Abstract

The yearly percentage of each category relative to the total number of radiology-related suits was determined, and then each group was furthen divided by specific diagnosis or incident.RESULTS. Along with all medical malpractice lawsuits, radiology-related suits rose dramatically until 1985, when there was a marked but temporary decline caused by tort reform measures enacted in Illinois. Since then, lawsuits have resumed their annual upward climb, although the overall percentage related to radiology has remained relatively constant (1 0-1 5%). The relative number of radiology-related lawsuits in specific categories has changed over the past two decades: the percentages of slip-and-fall, radiation oncology, and miscellaneous cases have decreased, but percentages for the remaining three groups have increased. Lawsuits related to missed diagnoses, which account for the largest category of radiology-related cases, have increased from 34% to 47% of the total. The greatest increase in this category is for breast cancer. Lawsuits claiming injury from complications, the largest subgroup of which is angiography, have grown slightly, but cases alleging failure to order a radiologic examination have shown the greatest percentage increase in the 20-year period, growing from 20% in 1975-1979 to 30% in 1990-1994. This rise is attributed to the greater number of claims involving mammography, CT, MR imaging, and angiography. The growth in failure-to-order lawsuits will have important ramifications as managed care and health reform proposals attempt to limit use of radiologic services.CONCLUSIONS. Notwithstanding the fact that tort reform measures in Illinois decreased the frequency of malpractice litigation temporarily in 1 985 and will likely do so again in 1995, medical malpractice is likely to continue to plague radiologists unabatedly for many years to come.

A 12-year follow-up study of malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy

“…In the United States, malpractice suits filed against radiologists account for 10%-15% of the total charges against physicians for inability or negligence even though in the United States radiologists overall are less exposed to the risk of legal action than are surgeons but much more exposed than are internists and specialists [9].…”

Medical errors, malpractice, and defensive medicine: an ill-fated triad

“…An American College of Radiology (ACR) Bulletin article in 1985 disclosed that missed fractures or dislocations were the leading cause of radiologic lawsuits in the US, but claims of failure to diagnose cancer were second in frequency [8]. Allegations against non-radiologic physicians for failure to order a radiologic exam doubled in the greater Chicago area between 1982 and 1994 [9]. A 1991 study disclosed that 75% of all adverse events due to negligence committed in New York hospitals in the late 1980s involved diagnostic mishaps, usually the result of a physician's failure to do something [10].…”

Ethical problems in radiology: medical error and disclosure

“…In that country, litigation against radiologists accounts for 10%-15% of total malpractice claims, even though radiologists in the United States are less exposed to the risk of litigation than are surgeons, but they are much more exposed than internists and other specialists [20]. The average compensation payouts agreed by the courts have tripled over the last 15 years, and approximately one third of cases conclude with conviction of the radiologist [15].…”

“…Sempre negli USA le denunce contro i radiologi rappresentano il 10%-15% del totale delle denunce contro i medici per imperizia o negligenza anche se, in quel paese, i radiologi risultano nel complesso meno esposti al rischio di citazioni rispetto ai chirurghi, ma molto più esposti dei medici internisti e specialisti [20]. Il risarcimento medio accordato dalle corti è triplicato negli ultimi 15 anni, e circa un terzo dei processi si conclude con la condanna del radiologo [15].…”