1990
DOI: 10.1097/00000372-199010000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant Melanoma with Pseudocarcinomatous Hyperplasia—An Entity That Can Simulate Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact etiology of bidirectional/dual differentiation is unclear although several hypotheses have been proposed. 13 Our case showed no evidence of pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. 10 Other proposed theories include aberrant expression of immunohistochemical markers by the neoplastic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The exact etiology of bidirectional/dual differentiation is unclear although several hypotheses have been proposed. 13 Our case showed no evidence of pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. 10 Other proposed theories include aberrant expression of immunohistochemical markers by the neoplastic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Malignant melanoma with pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia (MMPH) is another tumor to consider in the differential diagnosis, since it shares with PSCC an abnormal proliferation of keratinocytes and melanocytes. The tumors differ however, in that the epithelial proliferation (pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia) in MMPH is reactive in nature and occurs in response to an underlying malignant melanoma, 20 whereas the epidermal component in PSCC is frankly malignant admixed with benign dendritic melanocytes. It is important to make this distinction, since these tumors have significantly different prognoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these 2 retrospective clinicopathological studies, the contradictory epidemiologic data that were found probably reflects an insufficient number of cases because this is not a common type of melanoma. To date, only extremely rare additional cases have been reported, such as melanomas associated with pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia 9,10 or other entities that combine biphenotypic characteristics in the same neoplasm. [11][12][13] The histopathological appearance of our case obviously differs from verrucous-hyperkeratotic melanoma, since the lack of epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis is evident.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%