2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1368872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization reversal and coercivity of magnetic-force microscopy tips

Abstract: An experimental technique is presented that allows determining the magnetization reversal and coercivity of magnetic-force microscopy (MFM) tips. An Ω-shaped current carrying gold ring with a radius of 2400 nm fabricated by electron-beam lithography and a lift-off technique is charged with a constant current in order to produce a magnetic stray field in the z direction that is detected by MFM. While an oscillating MFM tip is continuously raster scanned across the center of the current ring, an external magneti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This field is too low to induce the change of magnetization configuration in the sample. However, since the CoCr MFM tip coating is magnetically harder than studied microbars (coercivity $360 Oe [41,42]), and the field at the tip surface determined by electron holography is 620 Oe [43], which is higher than the saturation magnetization of microbars in the plane, it is possible that the micromagnetic configurations were affected by the MFM tip while performing intermittent contact mode scans. Magnetic field of the tip, perpendicular to the sample surface, could initiate vortex formation.…”
Section: Sample -Mfm Tip Interactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This field is too low to induce the change of magnetization configuration in the sample. However, since the CoCr MFM tip coating is magnetically harder than studied microbars (coercivity $360 Oe [41,42]), and the field at the tip surface determined by electron holography is 620 Oe [43], which is higher than the saturation magnetization of microbars in the plane, it is possible that the micromagnetic configurations were affected by the MFM tip while performing intermittent contact mode scans. Magnetic field of the tip, perpendicular to the sample surface, could initiate vortex formation.…”
Section: Sample -Mfm Tip Interactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lift height was 100 nm. tips [41], calculated tip field was $16 Oe. This field is too low to induce the change of magnetization configuration in the sample.…”
Section: Sample -Mfm Tip Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] To quantitatively obtain the magnetic moment of the sample, some studies are focused on the method to determine magnetic reversals of MFM tip. 12,13 However, for the simpler case, when the sample with switching field is much less than that for the MFM tip, the MFM phase-shift should be basically quantifiable. In this letter, we provide quantitative MFM analysis for multidomain submicron wire, which also correlates with the magnetoresistance ͑MR͒ measurement and simulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tip consists of a cobalt-chromium compound, which is orthogonally magnetized with respect to the sample surface. Analogous to (Carl et al, 2001), we set the value for the magnetization in negative y-direction to M ¼ 749 kA/m. Furthermore, we assume such a hard ferromagnetic material, so that the permanent permeability of the pyramidal tip is approximately m r < 1.…”
Section: Micromagnetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%