2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3497-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Zeolite as Arsenic Sorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of pH on the zeta potential of synthetic magnetite in the absence and presence of molybdenum is given in Figure 2. The pH at which the zeta potential is zero is called the point of zero charge (pH pzc ) and lies, in the absence of molybdenum, around pH 4.0, in fair agreement with an earlier paper that reported a pH pzc of 4.86 for the same adsorbent (Vaclavikova 2010). Below pH 4, the adsorbent is positively charged.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of pH on the zeta potential of synthetic magnetite in the absence and presence of molybdenum is given in Figure 2. The pH at which the zeta potential is zero is called the point of zero charge (pH pzc ) and lies, in the absence of molybdenum, around pH 4.0, in fair agreement with an earlier paper that reported a pH pzc of 4.86 for the same adsorbent (Vaclavikova 2010). Below pH 4, the adsorbent is positively charged.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…New sorbent materials consisting of a matrix (zeolite, activated carbon, aluminum silicates, polymeric structures) hosting various types of adsorbents (e.g., hydrous ferric oxides, maghemite, polymers, HDTMA), have been developed and represent an innovative, attractive and economic approach for the removal of anions such as arsenate (Habuda-Stanic et al, 2008, Schmidt et al, 2008Vaclavikova et al, 2010), chromate (Misaelides et al, 2008, Barquist andLarsen, 2010), sulphate and phosphate (Oliveira andRubio, 2007, Vujakovic et al, 2000) and antimonate (Wingenfelder et al, 2006). Vaclavikova et al (2010) tested zeolite-supported magnetite for the removal of arsenic. This material combines good sorption affinity for oxyanions (from magnetite) with high affinity for cations (from the zeolite matrix).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(WHO, 2017) Heavy metal pollution includes metals such as arsenic, lead, nickel, tin, molybdenum, antimony, copper, selenium, which are recognised as some of the high toxicity materials, and are released into the environment by metallurgical industry effluents. (Václavíková et al, 2009) Presence of metals in wastewater has a beneficial side-effect of killing pathogens. However, if metal impurities are present in excess, they cause a problem for sludge disposal, resulting in higher process cost and environmental impact.…”
Section: Figure 2 Key Water Pollutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For column applications, nanosized materials must be coated on a larger sized carrier materials. Therefore adsorbents for oxyanions, consisting of magnetite supported by a zeolite or perlite matrix were developed (Verbinnen et al, 2012(Verbinnen et al, , 2013b(Verbinnen et al, , 2015Vaclavikova et al, 2010) One of the main questions that arises when discussing adsorption is whether or not the adsorbent can be regenerated after usage. For the adsorption of oxyanion forming elements and heavy metals on adsorbents, the regeneration of the spent adsorbent is not straightforward in most cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%