2014
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging safety of Epilong Soft epidural catheters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with Chillingworth et al that it is important to focus on a safe process of tracheal extubation before addressing concerns about theatre utilisation [1,2]. Chilling-…”
Section: Videolaryngoscopy In Traumasupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We agree with Chillingworth et al that it is important to focus on a safe process of tracheal extubation before addressing concerns about theatre utilisation [1,2]. Chilling-…”
Section: Videolaryngoscopy In Traumasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In their paper on airway management in cervical spine injury [1], focusing on videolaryngoscopy, Duggan and Griesdale mention characteristics that predispose to failure of videolaryngoscopy, including anatomical abnormality, local scarring, radiotherapy, and airway masses. An additional factor worth considering, especially in the context of trauma, is the impact of oropharyngeal blood on the videolaryngoscopic view, which can obscure the larynx or camera lens and obstruct the light source, reducing illumination.…”
Section: Videolaryngoscopy In Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We read McCall et al. 's letter about the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety of Epilong Soft Epidural Catheters (Pajunk Medizintechnologie GmBH, Geisingen, Germany) and would like to add further information for readers about the MRI compatibility of surgical clips and staples used in current surgical practice.…”
Section: Commonly‐used Devices and Their Mri Compatibility Clips Thamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…time to 2-month follow-up was 55.9 (13.1) days. Of the five patients unable to be imaged on POD 2, three declined, one was unwell with MRI transfer deemed unsafe and a final patient had an epidural catheter in situ that was not MRI compatible (11). Of the three patients unable to complete the protocol at 2 months; one declined, one was an inpatient at another hospital and the third had a contraindication to MRI as a result of recent cataract surgery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%