2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.002
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Globe-Tendon Interface for Extraocular Muscles: Is There an “Arc of Contact”?

Abstract: Contrary to the "arc of contact" biomechanical model, normal and postsurgical EOMs are significantly non-tangent to the globe at their scleral insertions. The "arc of contact" should be replaced in biomechanical modeling by the experimentally measured angles at tendon insertions. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
7
2
0
0

Citation Types

0
6
0
0

Year Published

Range
2019
2019
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)
references

References 52 publications

0
6
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The suggested principle has been to recess the MR bilaterally to correct for the distance esotropia and to use the PFS to correct for the convergence excess. However, the theoretical concept based on the arc of contact and shortening of the lever arm cannot fully explain how PFS alone can achieve good alignment in the primary gaze position [ 30 ]. Additionally, by axial magnetic resonance imaging, Clark et al demonstrated that significant change in extraocular muscle tangency with the globe does not occur after PFS of an extraocular muscle [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%