2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Properties of High-Nuclearity Fex-oxo (x = 7, 22, 24) Clusters Analyzed by a Multipronged Experimental, Computational, and Magnetostructural Correlation Approach

Abstract: The synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties of three related iron(III)-oxo clusters are reported, [ F e 7 O 3 ( O 2 C P h ) 9 ( m d a ) 3 ( H 2 O ) ]( 1 ) , [Fe 2 2 O 1 4 (OH) 3 (O 2 CMe) 2 1 (mda) 6 ](ClO 4 ) 2 (2), and [Fe 24 O 15 (OH) 4 (OEt)(O 2 CMe) 21 (mda) 7 ](ClO 4 ) 2 (3), where mdaH 2 is N-methyldiethanolamine. 1 was prepared from the reaction of [Fe 3 O(O 2 CPh) 6 (H 2 O) 3 ](NO 3 ) with mdaH 2 in a 1:2 ratio in MeCN, whereas 2 and 3 were prepared from the reaction of FeCl 3 /NaO 2 CMe/mdaH 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained J MSC / J DFT values can be seen to separate into two groups: (i) weak ones typically in the 0 to −10 cm –1 range characteristic of bis- or tris-monoatomically bridged Fe 2 pairs, i.e., {Fe­(O) 2 Fe} and {Fe­(O) 3 Fe} units, respectively, as a result of the resultant small Fe–O–Fe angles; and (ii) strong ones in the −25 to −40 cm –1 range characteristic of Fe 2 pairs with a single monatomic bridge, {Fe­(O)­Fe}, and thus larger Fe–O–Fe angles. These J i , j ranges are consistent with what we have observed previously for other Fe III /oxo clusters. ,, The tris-oxo-bridged Fe 2 pairs have particularly small Fe–O–Fe angles of 88.2° and 88.1° for the Fe10–Fe11 and Fe6–Fe7 pairs, respectively, and lead to the greatest differences in the values obtained by the three methods. In a previous study of an Fe 24 cluster, we even obtained weak ferromagnetic values for tris-oxo-bridged Fe 2 pairs .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained J MSC / J DFT values can be seen to separate into two groups: (i) weak ones typically in the 0 to −10 cm –1 range characteristic of bis- or tris-monoatomically bridged Fe 2 pairs, i.e., {Fe­(O) 2 Fe} and {Fe­(O) 3 Fe} units, respectively, as a result of the resultant small Fe–O–Fe angles; and (ii) strong ones in the −25 to −40 cm –1 range characteristic of Fe 2 pairs with a single monatomic bridge, {Fe­(O)­Fe}, and thus larger Fe–O–Fe angles. These J i , j ranges are consistent with what we have observed previously for other Fe III /oxo clusters. ,, The tris-oxo-bridged Fe 2 pairs have particularly small Fe–O–Fe angles of 88.2° and 88.1° for the Fe10–Fe11 and Fe6–Fe7 pairs, respectively, and lead to the greatest differences in the values obtained by the three methods. In a previous study of an Fe 24 cluster, we even obtained weak ferromagnetic values for tris-oxo-bridged Fe 2 pairs .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a previous study of an Fe 24 cluster, we even obtained weak ferromagnetic values for tris-oxo-bridged Fe 2 pairs. 17 Given the very small angles, we feel that the MSC values in Table 5 are the more reliable for these interactions. Unfortunately, we are unaware of any dinuclear Fe III compounds with three monatomic oxo bridges to allow comparisons of the sign and magnitude of reliable experimental J i,j values with those from J MSC and J DFT calculations using various functionals.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations