2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5d3d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Inflation and Stellar Mass. V. Intensification and Saturation of M-dwarf Absorption Lines with Rossby Number

Abstract: In young sun-like stars and field M dwarf stars, chromospheric and coronal magnetic activity indicators such as Hα, X-ray and radio emission are known to saturate with low Rossby number (Ro 0.1), defined as the ratio of rotation period to convective turnover time. The mechanism for the saturation is unclear. In this paper, we use photospheric Ti I and Ca I absorption lines in Y band to investigate magnetic field strength in M dwarfs for Rossby numbers between 0.01 and 1.0. The equivalent widths of the lines ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect magnetic activity proxies, such as chromospheric and coronal emission and photospheric absorption line strengths, are known to exhibit a prominent dependence on stellar rotation (e.g., Reiners et al 2014;Newton et al 2017;Wright et al 2011Wright et al , 2018Muirhead et al 2020). This dependence is best represented as a function of Rossby number (Ro), which is defined as the ratio of stellar rotation period P rot and convective turnover time-scale s. The typical behaviour found for cool active stars, including M dwarfs, is an increase of activity proxies and magnetic field strength with decreasing Rossby number until a saturation at Ro % 0.1 (e.g., Vidotto et al 2014a;Wright et al 2018;Kochukhov et al 2020).…”
Section: Magnetic Field and Stellar Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect magnetic activity proxies, such as chromospheric and coronal emission and photospheric absorption line strengths, are known to exhibit a prominent dependence on stellar rotation (e.g., Reiners et al 2014;Newton et al 2017;Wright et al 2011Wright et al , 2018Muirhead et al 2020). This dependence is best represented as a function of Rossby number (Ro), which is defined as the ratio of stellar rotation period P rot and convective turnover time-scale s. The typical behaviour found for cool active stars, including M dwarfs, is an increase of activity proxies and magnetic field strength with decreasing Rossby number until a saturation at Ro % 0.1 (e.g., Vidotto et al 2014a;Wright et al 2018;Kochukhov et al 2020).…”
Section: Magnetic Field and Stellar Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussing their study of M35, Jeffries et al (2021) note that stars currently with moderately slow 10 day periods would have had Rossby numbers low enough for the magnetic activity indicators to be saturated during the rapid lithium depletion phase (e.g. Vilhu 1984;Pizzolato et al 2003;Reiners et al 2009;Marsden et al 2009;Wright et al 2011;Jeffries et al 2011;Muirhead et al 2020). This suggests that even if magnetic effects tightly correlate with rotation, they alone cannot explain the observed lithium-rotation trend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect magnetic activity proxies, such as chromospheric and coronal emission and photospheric absorption line strengths, are known to exhibit a prominent dependence on stellar rotation (e.g. Reiners et al 2014;Newton et al 2017;Wright et al 2011Wright et al , 2018Muirhead et al 2020). This dependence is best represented as a function of Rossby number (Ro), which is defined as the ratio of stellar rotation period 𝑃 rot and convective turnover time-scale 𝜏.…”
Section: Magnetic Field and Stellar Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%