2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016jb013683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: We present results for a series of hysteresis measurements that provide information about remanent, induced, transient‐free, and transient magnetization components. These measurements, and differences between measurement types, enable production of six types of first‐order reversal curve (FORC)‐like diagrams which only double the number of measurements involved in a conventional FORC measurement. These diagrams can be used to distinguish magnetic signatures associated with each domain state. When analyzing sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
175
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
10
175
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transient energy dissipation, EtΔ, as discussed in section , is represented by the area between a downward branch of a major hysteresis loop and a so‐called zero‐FORC (Yu & Tauxe, ), which is a magnetization curve measured from saturation remanence (i.e., at B = 0) back to a saturating field (Fabian & von Dobeneck, ). This difference between the upper major loop branch and a zero‐FORC is due to irreversible self‐demagnetization processes such as domain wall nucleation and pinning (Fabian, ) and vortex nucleation and annihilation (Roberts et al, ; Zhao et al, ). The vertical and horizontal axes in a Fabian diagram are given by σ hys and EtΔ/ E hys , respectively (Figure e).…”
Section: Candidate Approaches For Domain State Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Transient energy dissipation, EtΔ, as discussed in section , is represented by the area between a downward branch of a major hysteresis loop and a so‐called zero‐FORC (Yu & Tauxe, ), which is a magnetization curve measured from saturation remanence (i.e., at B = 0) back to a saturating field (Fabian & von Dobeneck, ). This difference between the upper major loop branch and a zero‐FORC is due to irreversible self‐demagnetization processes such as domain wall nucleation and pinning (Fabian, ) and vortex nucleation and annihilation (Roberts et al, ; Zhao et al, ). The vertical and horizontal axes in a Fabian diagram are given by σ hys and EtΔ/ E hys , respectively (Figure e).…”
Section: Candidate Approaches For Domain State Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further illustration of the methods evaluated in this paper, particularly FORC‐based approaches for domain state diagnosis (Zhao et al, ) and FORC unmixing (Harrison et al, ). (a) The Egli diagram (Egli, , , ) with regions for extracellular (EX), detrital (D), biogenic soft (BS), and biogenic hard (BH) magnetite.…”
Section: Candidate Approaches For Domain State Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations