2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.9b00917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macromolecular Effect Stabilized Color-Tunable and Room Temperature Charge-Transfer Complexes Based on Donor–Acceptor Assemblies

Abstract: We report one of the first examples of room temperature stable solid-state charge transfer (CT) complexes based on a segmented π-conjugated polymer and rylene diimide donor–acceptor system having tunable optical transitions from the visible to NIR region in the solar spectrum. Semicrystalline and amorphous segmented oligo-phenylenevinylene (OPV) chromophore containing polymers were tailor-made with flexible polymethylene chains in the backbone. The electron rich segmented OPV polymers were complexed with two e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, no significant polaron-pair feature is observed with MV 2+ :RR-E or ENDI:RR-B; this provides further support that the polymer chains interact co-facially with the acceptors, preventing direct polymer–polymer interactions. However, the observation of H-like aggregate excitonic coupling implies interstrand dipolar coupling, which points to a stacked structure of alternating or interleaving donor and acceptor layers such that complexes have some greater degree of supramolecular assembly . Given that polaron pairs are commonly observed for stacked polymer morphologies, our data suggests that ENDI-PTAK complexes may be best visualized as small assemblies with interdigitating layers of co-facially stacked donors and acceptorsresulting in H-like excitonic coupling between polymer strands within stacks, but with co-facial donor–acceptor interactions inhibiting direct interstrand orbital interactions and, therefore, polaron-pair formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, no significant polaron-pair feature is observed with MV 2+ :RR-E or ENDI:RR-B; this provides further support that the polymer chains interact co-facially with the acceptors, preventing direct polymer–polymer interactions. However, the observation of H-like aggregate excitonic coupling implies interstrand dipolar coupling, which points to a stacked structure of alternating or interleaving donor and acceptor layers such that complexes have some greater degree of supramolecular assembly . Given that polaron pairs are commonly observed for stacked polymer morphologies, our data suggests that ENDI-PTAK complexes may be best visualized as small assemblies with interdigitating layers of co-facially stacked donors and acceptorsresulting in H-like excitonic coupling between polymer strands within stacks, but with co-facial donor–acceptor interactions inhibiting direct interstrand orbital interactions and, therefore, polaron-pair formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the observation of H-like aggregate excitonic coupling implies interstrand dipolar coupling, which points to a stacked structure of alternating or interleaving donor and acceptor layers such that complexes have some greater degree of supramolecular assembly. 74 Given that polaron pairs are commonly observed for stacked polymer morphologies, our data suggests that ENDI-PTAK complexes may be best visualized as small assemblies with interdigitating layers of co-facially stacked donors and acceptors�resulting in H-like excitonic coupling between polymer strands within stacks, but with co-facial donor−acceptor interactions inhibiting direct interstrand orbital interactions and, therefore, polaron-pair formation. This is consistent with the previously noted competition between polaron and polaron-pair formation in ENDI:RR-B complexes with variation in acceptor ratio: charge separation between RR butanoate and ENDI:polar-pairs are generated more efficiently in low vs high ratio ENDI:PTAK CPECs, which is attributable to a decreased acceptor density and differences in PTAK microstructure.…”
Section: Composition-dependent Microstructure Of Cpecsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…S10). Thermochromism in aromatic CT complexes [30][31][32] has been observed to occur via structural reorganisation [33] and phase separation. [34] Since phase separation would result in two CT-active compounds, it must be a degree of conformational reorganisation upon interaction of the two compounds which is occurring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete quenching of P3HT photoluminescence at 570 nm with the addition of F4TCNQ also supports efficient CT interactions (Figure 1c). 35,36 The ground state CT was also confirmed by X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy (Figure 1d). The P3HT-b-PEO/F4TCNQ mixture showed an EPR signal with a g-factor of 2.001 from P3HT radical cations, 28,18 which was absent in the P3HT-b-PEO spectrum without F4TCNQ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%