2017
DOI: 10.1109/comst.2017.2678518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-to-Machine Communications in Ultra-Dense Networks—A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several survey papers exist in the literature in the context of dynamic spectrum sharing and spectral coexistence covering a wide range of areas such as spectrum occupancy modeling and measurements [29,30], interweave DSS [31,32,34], underlay DSS [35][36][37], overlay DSS [38], MAC protocols for DSS [39], spectrum decision [43], spectrum assignment [44], security for DSS [40], learning for DSS [41,42], DSS under practical imperfections [13], licensed spectrum sharing [61][62][63] IoT, M2M and D2D [64][65][66][67] techniques [45], and the coexistence of LTE and WiFi [46]. Furthermore, the contribution in [37] provided a comprehensive review of radio resource allocation techniques for efficient spectrum sharing based on different design techniques such as transmission power-based versus SINRbased, and centralized versus distributed method, and further provided various requirements for the efficient resource allocation techniques.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several survey papers exist in the literature in the context of dynamic spectrum sharing and spectral coexistence covering a wide range of areas such as spectrum occupancy modeling and measurements [29,30], interweave DSS [31,32,34], underlay DSS [35][36][37], overlay DSS [38], MAC protocols for DSS [39], spectrum decision [43], spectrum assignment [44], security for DSS [40], learning for DSS [41,42], DSS under practical imperfections [13], licensed spectrum sharing [61][62][63] IoT, M2M and D2D [64][65][66][67] techniques [45], and the coexistence of LTE and WiFi [46]. Furthermore, the contribution in [37] provided a comprehensive review of radio resource allocation techniques for efficient spectrum sharing based on different design techniques such as transmission power-based versus SINRbased, and centralized versus distributed method, and further provided various requirements for the efficient resource allocation techniques.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the direction of energy-efficient 5G communications, authors in [53,54] provided a detailed survey of the existing works in the areas of energy-efficient techniques for 5G networks and analyzed various green trade-offs, namely, spectrum efficiency versus energy efficiency, delay versus power, deployment efficiency versus energy efficiency, and bandwidth versus power for the effective design of energy-efficient 5G networks [53]. In addition, several survey and overview papers exist in the area of 5G enabling technologies such as massive MIMO [7,[55][56][57], mmWave [7,8,58], Non Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) [59,60], cellular and heterogeneous networks [61][62][63], Internet of Things (IoT) [66,68], Machine to Machine (M2M) communication [64][65][66] and Device to Device (D2D) communication [67].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Internet has traditionally been dominated by human‐to‐human (H2H) communication, the past decade has witnessed a rapid rise in machine‐type communications (MTC) that include human‐to‐machine (H2M), machine‐to‐human (M2H), and machine‐to‐machine (M2M) communications. This has given rise to the Internet of Things (IoT), a network that connects devices that carry out both H2H communications and MTC . For a fully fledged IoT, communication networks should be able to support heterogeneity in devices ranging from transmit power to required data rates .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] For a fully fledged IoT, communication networks should be able to support heterogeneity in devices ranging from transmit power to required data rates. 3,4 Although several existing technologies can support high transmit power devices over both short and long ranges and others support low transmit power devices over short ranges, most cannot support low transmit power devices over long ranges. 3 Furthermore, the cost of licensed spectrum is prohibitive for some IoT applications, mainly those involving MTC, which makes using license-exempt bands an attractive alternative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation