2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-018-0118-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning techniques for state recognition and auto-tuning in quantum dots

Abstract: Recent progress in building large-scale quantum devices for exploring quantum computing and simulation paradigms has relied upon effective tools for achieving and maintaining good experimental parameters, i.e., tuning up devices. In many cases, including in quantum-dot based architectures, the parameter space grows substantially with the number of qubits, and may become a limit to scalability. Fortunately, machine learning techniques for pattern recognition and image classification using so-called deep neural … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of machine learning in finding patterns and optima in data which depends on many parameters is apparent across multiple fields of research [40]. In our specific case, machine learning has provided a means for autonomous experimental optimization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of machine learning in finding patterns and optima in data which depends on many parameters is apparent across multiple fields of research [40]. In our specific case, machine learning has provided a means for autonomous experimental optimization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate the non-linearity of the cost function, we include the Gaussian error linear unit (GELU) activation function for each node [39]. This continuous function is a popular choice for data which is subject to normally-distributed stochastic variation, which suits our experimental context [40]. In addition, the structure and scale of the ANN must be appropriate for the complexity and size of the vector inputs.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More and more nanomaterial‐related databases are available, such as Nanoparticle Information Library (NIL), Nano‐HUB database, and Investigation Study Assay tab‐delimited format (ISA‐TAB‐Nano) . Moreover, with the improvement of computational capabilities and algorithms, machine learning is paving a promising path to accelerating nanomaterials discovery, design and applications ( Figure ) . Although machine learning has shown the capabilities of making predictions with little human input, high time‐efficiency and performance‐efficiency, it also creates new challenges in guaranteeing the prediction accuracy for nanomaterials science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published by Nature Publishing Group. State recognition and autotuning in QDs: Reproduced with permission under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License . Copyright 2019, Nature Publishing Group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key challenges in scaling up spin qubits is developing the software tools necessary to keep pace with increasingly complex devices. To date, approaches to implementing automated control software during tune-up of semiconductor qubits include training neural networks to identify the state of a device 16 , experimentally realizing automated control procedures for tuning double quantum dot (DQD) devices into the single-electron regime 17 , and automatically tuning the interdot tunnel coupling in a DQD [18][19][20] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%