2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06794-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning models accurately predict recurrent infection following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection

Abstract: Purpose This study aimed to develop and validate machine-learning models for the prediction of recurrent infection in patients following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. Methods A total of 618 consecutive patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. The patient cohort included 165 patients with confirmed recurrent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Potential risk factors including patient demographics and surgical characteristics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Li et al developed a XGBoost model to predict the length of stay after TKA based on 1,826 cases in a single centre and yielded an AUC of 0.74, concluding an improved prediction in comparison to logistic regression models [21]. Recently, Klemt et al investigated four different ML models on 618 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA for periprosthetic joint infection to predict recurrent infection and achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC range 0.81–0.84) [17]. Kunze et al examined in a multicentre approach 430 patients and evaluated a Five supervised machine learning algorithms to identify factors for predicting dissatisfaction after primary TKA, yielding a Brier score of 0.082 [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Li et al developed a XGBoost model to predict the length of stay after TKA based on 1,826 cases in a single centre and yielded an AUC of 0.74, concluding an improved prediction in comparison to logistic regression models [21]. Recently, Klemt et al investigated four different ML models on 618 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA for periprosthetic joint infection to predict recurrent infection and achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC range 0.81–0.84) [17]. Kunze et al examined in a multicentre approach 430 patients and evaluated a Five supervised machine learning algorithms to identify factors for predicting dissatisfaction after primary TKA, yielding a Brier score of 0.082 [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, informatic features include demographics, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory test results, and based on work done by the Shock Trauma team, a postoperative infection risk score model [20] showed good prediction on infection risks. Current applications using informatic features as predictive tools are mainly in periprosthetic joint infection prediction [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artiicial intelligence (AI) algorithms, such as artiicial neural networks (ANN), represent valuable tools for analyzing and interpreting large and complex datasets, thus these were applied in many medical ields [4,23]. Although AI algorithms were used in prior literature to predict clinical and functional outcomes for patients following arthroplasty surgery [15][16][17], AI algorithms have yet to be used for the prediction of prolonged length of stay. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate artiicial intelligence algorithms for identifying patients at higher risk of prolonged length of stay following revision total knee arthroplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%