2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.17.476508
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning guided signal enrichment for ultrasensitive plasma tumor burden monitoring

Abstract: In solid tumor oncology, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is poised to transform care through accurate assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) and therapeutic response monitoring. To overcome the sparsity of ctDNA fragments in low tumor fraction (TF) settings and increase MRD sensitivity, we previously leveraged genome-wide mutational integration through plasma whole genome sequencing (WGS). We now introduce MRD-EDGE, a composite machine learning-guided WGS ctDNA single nucleotide variant (SNV) and copy numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost per base of Nanopore sequencing is currently several-fold higher than Illumina, although the new generation of ONT PromethION sequencers is meant to address this and increase throughput. Single-nucleotide and indel error rates are higher for the ONT platform, which could pose an issue for whole-genome analysis of mutational signatures [39,40], something we do not investigate here but is theoretically possible from cfNano. While Nanopore error rates have improved significantly over the past several years, this is a weak point that should be considered if mutations are a priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost per base of Nanopore sequencing is currently several-fold higher than Illumina, although the new generation of ONT PromethION sequencers is meant to address this and increase throughput. Single-nucleotide and indel error rates are higher for the ONT platform, which could pose an issue for whole-genome analysis of mutational signatures [39,40], something we do not investigate here but is theoretically possible from cfNano. While Nanopore error rates have improved significantly over the past several years, this is a weak point that should be considered if mutations are a priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We admixed reads from MEL-01 (stage IV melanoma patient, TF = 22%) and CTRL-05 (no known cancer) at different ratios to create admixtures of tumor fractions ranging from 10 −7 -10 −2 (n = 50 technical replicates per admixture) at 80x sequencing depth. Our group previously developed MRD-EDGE SNV 40 , a cancer-specific deep learning classifier that uses mutation sequence context and other features to analytically distinguish ctDNA from sequencing error at low tumor fractions. Our Ultima-specific denoising framework, in combination with the MRD-EDGE SNV deep-learning architecture, allowed ctDNA detection in the part per million range (Figure 1F), demonstrating the power of deeper WGS to increase ctDNA detection sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor fractions were estimated by dividing the number of filtered reads containing the somatic mutation by the total number of filtered reads. For the lower limit of detection estimation, denoised-reads were processed through MRD-EDGE 40 as described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost per base of Nanopore sequencing is currently several-fold higher than Illumina, although the new generation of ONT PromethION sequencers are meant to address this as well as increase throughput. Single-nucleotide and indel error rates are higher for the ONT platform, which could pose an issue for whole-genome analysis of mutational signatures ( 38, 39 ), something we do not investigate here but is theoretically possible from cfNano. While Nanopore error rates have improved significantly over the past several years, this is a weak point that should be considered if mutations are a priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%