2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2016.7899657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning framework incorporating expert knowledge in tissue image annotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c). Since determination of SC purity by manual counting is time consuming, we used a novel software developed by our group (Kromp et al, ) which measures single cell features of IF‐images after semi‐automated image acquisition. Only 500–1,000 cells are required for Image Scatter‐Plot (ISP) analysis, which visualizes cells according to their cellular features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c). Since determination of SC purity by manual counting is time consuming, we used a novel software developed by our group (Kromp et al, ) which measures single cell features of IF‐images after semi‐automated image acquisition. Only 500–1,000 cells are required for Image Scatter‐Plot (ISP) analysis, which visualizes cells according to their cellular features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visualization of single cells (cropped nuclear images) arranged according to chosen features in a two‐dimensional plot is provided as and referred to as Image Scatter‐Plot (ISP). Hierarchical gating strategies comparable to flow cytometry analysis were applied to the ISP (Kromp et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ogists trained by a disease expert. To accelerate the time consuming process of image annotation, a machine learning-based framework (MLF) was utilized supporting the process of annotation by learning characteristics of annotation in multiple steps 24 . The MLF annotations result in a coarse annotation of nuclear contours and have to be refined to serve as ground truth annotation.…”
Section: Ground Truth Annotation Nuclei Image Annotation Was Performmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HaCaT and NB samples were acquired with a 63x magnifying objective whereas ganglioneuroma samples were acquired using a 10x magnifying objective. Trained undergraduate students created nuclear label masks using a recently developed machine learning framework [27]. They annotated all images except two.…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%