2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25206-8_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for the Detection of Spam in Twitter Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Menggunakan algoritme Random Forest dengan presisi sebesar 95.7% dan F-measure sebesar 95.7%. Prototipe deteksi akun spam pada Twitter dibangun oleh Wang (2012). Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa bayesian classifier menunjukkan kinerja yang baik dibandingkan classifier lainnya dalam mendeteksi akun spam pada Twitter.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Menggunakan algoritme Random Forest dengan presisi sebesar 95.7% dan F-measure sebesar 95.7%. Prototipe deteksi akun spam pada Twitter dibangun oleh Wang (2012). Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa bayesian classifier menunjukkan kinerja yang baik dibandingkan classifier lainnya dalam mendeteksi akun spam pada Twitter.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Their results showed that the Random Forest algorithm has the best performance. Wang [21] indicated that Naive Bayesian has better classification results than the Neural Network, Decision Tree, SVM and k-NN on the dataset he collected.…”
Section: A Spammer Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They implemented a logistic regression classifier and crawl URLs as they are submitted to web services to determine whether the URLs direct to spam. Much preliminary work (Benevenuto et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2010;Stringhini et al, 2010;Wang, 2010;Wang, 2012) relies on account features including the number of followers and friends, text similarities between tweets, URL ratios, and account creation dates, although most of these features can be easily manipulated by spammers. That is why works have emerged recently that try to extract features that are most difficult to simulate.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%