2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1re00351h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning based interpretation of microkinetic data: a Fischer–Tropsch synthesis case study

Abstract: Machine-Learning (ML) methods, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) bring the data-driven design of chemical reactions within reach. Simultaneously with the verification of the absence of any bias in the...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most important is to retain the accuracy on the model simulations, as e.g., successfully demonstrated for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using a ML model trained using data generated from a microkinetic model. 172 Interpretability techniques have been used to demonstrate that the trends predicted as a function of the operating variables is indeed present in the ML model, albeit that no fundamental relationship can be formulated. Nevertheless, as ML model simulated outlet values closely correspond to the ones simulated with detailed models, ML models can be envisaged as a potential tool for upscaling purposes.…”
Section: Plant-scale Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most important is to retain the accuracy on the model simulations, as e.g., successfully demonstrated for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using a ML model trained using data generated from a microkinetic model. 172 Interpretability techniques have been used to demonstrate that the trends predicted as a function of the operating variables is indeed present in the ML model, albeit that no fundamental relationship can be formulated. Nevertheless, as ML model simulated outlet values closely correspond to the ones simulated with detailed models, ML models can be envisaged as a potential tool for upscaling purposes.…”
Section: Plant-scale Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger Shapley value represents larger marginal contribution. The principles and procedures of the SHAP method have been illustrated by Chakkingal et al in detail …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principles and procedures of the SHAP method have been illustrated by Chakkingal et al in detail. 60…”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml) Models and Model Interpretabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using machine learning methods such as neural network (NN) [39,40] and support vector regression (SVR) [41] to predict a single response FTS process have also been reported in literature, as an alternative to detailed kinetic models. Compared to that, only a limited number publications on ML methods for a multi-response scenario [42,43], such as conversion and selectivities in the FTS process, have been reported.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods Are Typically Approached Asmentioning
confidence: 99%