2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning based algorithms for uncertainty quantification in numerical weather prediction models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no single algorithm that works best under all conditions. [ 45 ]. Firstly, we compared the estimation accuracy of three widely used machine learning models in our study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no single algorithm that works best under all conditions. [ 45 ]. Firstly, we compared the estimation accuracy of three widely used machine learning models in our study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists, while running some long or short-range experiments, usually do it, and compare verification results over different configurations. A machine learning-based approach for this process has been proposed in the literature [35,36]. Various microphysics schemes, cumulus parameterizations, and shortwave and longwave radiation schemes were examined, and based on the relationship between the choice of physical processes and the resulting forecast errors, a machine learning model was built to assess WRF model uncertainty.…”
Section: Atmospheric Physics and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also suggests that the thresholds are prone to fluctuation, even when applied conservatively, resulting in false negatives (i.e., bots being mistaken for people) and false positives (i.e., humans being classed as bots). Most social science studies that employ the technology will incorrectly count a significant number of human users as bots, and vice versa [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. There is more research on revealing the communities of such profiles on social media applications [27,28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the value of the bootstrap condition is true or in default, the sub-sample size is regulated by the maximum number of samples argument; otherwise, the entire dataset is utilised to create each tree. Being an ensemble learning technique, in most of the binary as well as binary classification problems, it provides reliable solutions with good accuracy [16]. Hence, we have considered it as an existing counterpart to compare the results of our proposed model.…”
Section: Random Forest Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%