2022
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12010197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Approach to Simulate Soil CO2 Fluxes under Cropping Systems

Abstract: With the growing number of datasets to describe greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, there is an opportunity to develop novel predictive models that require neither the expense nor time required to make direct field measurements. This study evaluates the potential for machine learning (ML) approaches to predict soil GHG emissions without the biogeochemical expertise that is required to use many current models for simulating soil GHGs. There are ample data from field measurements now publicly available to test new m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most authors argue that soil temperature is associated with CO 2 and NO 2 emissions: as the soil temperature increases, so does the release of these gases into the atmosphere. Thus, this effect becomes a positive feedback loop in the climate system [ 55 ]. Our results confirm that meteorological conditions are important (Tables 4 and 5); precipitation decreased during the vegetation period and active temperatures were also lower compared to the long-term averages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors argue that soil temperature is associated with CO 2 and NO 2 emissions: as the soil temperature increases, so does the release of these gases into the atmosphere. Thus, this effect becomes a positive feedback loop in the climate system [ 55 ]. Our results confirm that meteorological conditions are important (Tables 4 and 5); precipitation decreased during the vegetation period and active temperatures were also lower compared to the long-term averages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon sequestration rates found in previous studies range from 0.1 to 3.0 Mg ha −1 year −1 (Table 5), but the mean sequestration rate reported in prior works was 1.1 Mg ha −1 year −1 , similar to the mean resolved in this study (Table 5). The diverse site conditions, geographical locations, soil types, management strategies, and prior land use histories may provide an explanation for the range in C accumulation (Adjuik & Davis, 2022; Anderson‐Teixeira et al., 2009; Davis et al., 2013; Zimmermann et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model presented by Zhang et al [20] used multiple sets of machine learning methods to identify the carbon content in the soil in a specific region. Similarly, various other work was conducted to assess various problems that directly relate to assessment of soil quality; the studies included averaging method for soil properties [21], forecasting carbon in soil using multiple sets of machine learning [22], yield prediction [23], assessing effectiveness of machine learning [24], growth prediction using deep learning [25], assessing CO2 fluxes [26], prediction of texture [27], reliability forecasting model [28], and carbon variability assessment [29]. A fuzzy-logic-based approach for assessing soil quality has also been investigated by Ogunleye et al [30], Nooriman et al [31], Hoseini [32], Chen et al [33], and Atijosan et al [34].…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%