1986
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(86)90029-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood and malignant effusions of cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malignant pleural fluid has been studied in the past as if it were a single entity, and the cellular and cytokine components have generally not been studied by grouping them according to tumor type. [27][28][29] For example, a recent study by Atanackovic et al examined adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors on lymphocytes from 16 malignant effusions due to eight different tumor types. 27 Here, we demonstrate that there are significant differences in the regulatory and activated lymphoid components of pleural effusions secondary to mesothelioma as compared to those secondary to NSCLC or breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malignant pleural fluid has been studied in the past as if it were a single entity, and the cellular and cytokine components have generally not been studied by grouping them according to tumor type. [27][28][29] For example, a recent study by Atanackovic et al examined adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors on lymphocytes from 16 malignant effusions due to eight different tumor types. 27 Here, we demonstrate that there are significant differences in the regulatory and activated lymphoid components of pleural effusions secondary to mesothelioma as compared to those secondary to NSCLC or breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly elevated pleural fluid slL-2R values in TB and malignant pleurisy seems to be due to a high percentage o f activated lymphocytes in these effu sions [19][20][21]. It may reflect the activation o f local im mune status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test was carried out as described by Reinherz et al 4 Mononuclear cells were obtained by the standard fractionation Hypaque gradient centrifugation technique. Helper and suppressor cells were identified by using three murine monoclonal antibodies (Ortho Pharmaceuticals, Raritan, NJ): CD3 for mature T lymphocytes; CD4 for helper inducer cells, and CD8 for suppressor cytotoxic (method described previously 5 ). The appropriate monoclonal antibody was added to aliquots of 1-2 ϫ 10 6 cells and the cells were stained by an immune fluorescent technique using a fluorescein-labeled goat antimouse: immunoglobulin (Ig)G fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat antimouse IgG antibody (Tago Inc., Burlingame, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate monoclonal antibody was added to aliquots of 1-2 ϫ 10 6 cells and the cells were stained by an immune fluorescent technique using a fluorescein-labeled goat antimouse: immunoglobulin (Ig)G fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat antimouse IgG antibody (Tago Inc., Burlingame, CA). 5 T-cell subsets distribution was evaluated using the flow cytometer (FacScan, Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%