2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02638-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumen-apposing covered self-expanding metallic stent for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: assessment of outcomes and complications with CT and MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In prior decades, this was managed by percutaneous drainage or surgical debridement. The current standard of care for management of these pancreatic collections in adults is EUS-guided drainage of the fluid collection with plastic or lumen apposing metallic stents (LAMS) when the collection is mature [46][47][48]. Acute pancreatitis without necrosis typically does not result in severe complications in children, and severe necrotizing pancreatitis is less common in children relative to adults [28,49].…”
Section: Course and Complications Of Acute Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prior decades, this was managed by percutaneous drainage or surgical debridement. The current standard of care for management of these pancreatic collections in adults is EUS-guided drainage of the fluid collection with plastic or lumen apposing metallic stents (LAMS) when the collection is mature [46][47][48]. Acute pancreatitis without necrosis typically does not result in severe complications in children, and severe necrotizing pancreatitis is less common in children relative to adults [28,49].…”
Section: Course and Complications Of Acute Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased rate of bleeding was corroborated in another retrospective comparison showing a significantly increased rate of bleeding in LAMS compared with DPS (19% vs. 1%, P = 0.0003) 9. In retrospective reviews of bleeding complications related to LAMS, 6.2% of patients (6/97) underwent embolization after LAMS in one study; in another study, 17.9% (5/28) required embolization 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Subsequently, either straight ERCP plastic stents or pig-tailed stents can be inserted into the pseudocyst and left in situ (Figure 12D). Recently, the temporary placement of selfexpanding metal stents has been reported (AXIOS, Figure 12E) (100,101). Fluid will then follow the path of least resistance, and the presumed communication with the pancreatic duct will close, preventing further accumulation of pancreatic fluid in the cyst.…”
Section: Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainagementioning
confidence: 99%