<p>When Politics Meets Pandemic: How Prime Minister Netanyahu and a Small Team Communicated Health and Risk Information to the Israeli Public During the Early Stages of COVID-19</p>

Abstract

Background The coronavirus brought the world’s leaders to the center of the media stage, where they not only managed the COVID-19 pandemic but also communicated it to the public. The means they used to communicate the global pandemic reveal their strategies and the narratives they chose to create in their nation’s social consciousness. In Israel, the crisis broke out after three election cycles, such that the government in charge of the crisis was an interim government under the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was operating under three criminal indictments. This study sought to examine the ways in which Prime Minister Netanyahu and two senior Israel Ministry of Health officials—Director General Moshe Bar Siman Tov and Prof. Sigal Sadetsky, Head of Public Health Services—communicated information about the health crisis in Israel during what has been termed the first wave and the beginning of the second wave. Methods and Sample The research adopted qualitative methods (discourse, content and thematic analysis) to analyze the communication strategies and compare them to health and risk communication. Triangulated data collection from different data sources was used to increase the credibility and validity of the results. The research sample comprised the following sources from March 3 through June 21, 2020: transcripts of 19 press conferences and 12 press interviews, 95 emergency regulations signed by Prime Minister Netanyahu, and 52 articles in major Israeli newspapers. Results Netanyahu and the Health Ministry Director General used an apocalyptic narrative to communicate COVID-19 to the public. The main strategies used in constructing this narrative were intimidation, lack of information transparency, giving the public conflicting instructions contrary to the health and risk communicating approach, and using a health crisis to promote political intentions and actions. Conclusion Communicating health crises to the public, particularly ongoing crises like COVID-19, requires that leaders implement the health and risk communication approach and create a cooperative narrative that does not rely on a strategy of intimidation, but rather on empathy and on fact-based and transparent information.

Mental associations with COVID-19 and how they relate with self-reported protective behaviors: A national survey in the United States

“…When faced with a novel disease such as COVID-19, people may try to draw comparisons to various other diseases ( Atkinson et al, 2020 ; Gesser-Edelsburg and Hijazi, 2020 ; De Ridder, 2020 ). Such comparisons could have implications for their motivations to implement protective behaviors ( Edwards, 2003 ).…”

“…Comparisons between COVID-19 and other diseases also appeared in the public discourse. Policymakers and health care providers in Israel and the UK used comparisons to pandemic rather than seasonal influenza ( Atkinson et al, 2020 ; Gesser-Edelsburg and Hijazi, 2020 ). An analysis of Flemish newspaper articles published early in the pandemic found that COVID-19 was compared with pandemic influenza (Spanish flu, H1N1), SARS, MERS, and Ebola ( De Ridder, 2020 ).…”

How to Make Health and Risk Communication on Social Media More “Social” During COVID-19

“…First, most health organizations, and mainly governmental organizations, are still quite based on an organizational structure that is primarily hierarchical and much less cooperative and democratic, and this structure affects how information is processed and disseminated. 116 Second, many public health employees in key positions in government and health organizations still use paternalistic thought patterns. In addition, the experts who manage the policy of government ministries perceive any disagreements in how they chart government policy as a threat to their professional status.…”

“…This approach often conflicts with the essence of scientific language as a language of inquiry and doubt that communicates uncertainty wherever it exists. 116 …”

Who are the “Real” Experts? The Debate Surrounding COVID-19 Health Risk Management: An Israeli Case Study

“…Indeed, when the COVID-19 pandemic began, Israel was being governed by an interim prime minister operating under three criminal indictments, after three election cycles. 46 , 47 The pandemic generated a multidimensional crisis in Israel that undermined economic and social resilience, challenged effective governance and even provided a cover for processes that had the potential to harm democratic values.…”