1998
DOI: 10.11646/bde.15.1.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p><strong>Briófitas de uma área de Cerrado no município de Alagoinhas, Bahia, Brasil</strong></p>

Abstract: In A taxonomic survey carried out in cerrado vegetation from Alagoinhas county, State of Bahia, 15 species of Bryophyta, were identified distributed into 12 genera and 9 families, and 12 species of Hepatophyta distributed in 7 genera and 2 families.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
1
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
6
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no families that were exclusive to the cerrado, and the flora of our study sites had low floristic affinity with those described in other studies of the cerrado in northeastern Brazil (Vilas Bôas- Bastos & Bastos 1998;Castro et al 2002). It is noteworthy that the areas of cerrado investigated in our study were quite dry, and some bore evidence of recent fires.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found no families that were exclusive to the cerrado, and the flora of our study sites had low floristic affinity with those described in other studies of the cerrado in northeastern Brazil (Vilas Bôas- Bastos & Bastos 1998;Castro et al 2002). It is noteworthy that the areas of cerrado investigated in our study were quite dry, and some bore evidence of recent fires.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Therefore, in Brazil as a whole, systematic floristic studies of bryophytes have most often been conducted in forests, including those in the states of Rio de Janeiro (Costa 1999;Costa & Lima 2005;Molinaro & Costa 2001;Santos & Costa 2010a, 2010b, Espírito Santo (Costa & Silva 2003;Yano 2005), São Paulo (Visnadi 2005;Visnadi & Vital 2000;Peralta & Yano 2005), Pernambuco (Pôrto 1990(Pôrto , 1992Germano & Pôrto 1996;Campelo & Pôrto 2007;Alvarenga & Pôrto 2007), Alagoas (Silva & Pôrto 2009) and Bahia (Valente & Pôrto 2006;Bastos & Valente 2008;Valente et al 2009). Studies of bryophytes in the cerrado have been conducted in the states of São Paulo (Egunyomi & Vital 1984;Visnadi 2004), Bahia (Vilas Bôas- Bastos & Bastos 1998) and Piauí (Castro et al 2002), as well as in the Federal District of Brasília (Câmara & Costa 2006;Câmara 2008aCâmara , 2008b. In the campos rupestres, bryophytes have been studied in the state of Minas Gerais-in the Serra do Cipó (Yano 1987), Serra da Piedade (Yano & Carvalho 1995) and Grão Mogol (Yano & Peralta 2009)-and in the state of Bahia, specifically within the Chapada Diamantina ecoregion (Harley 1995;Bastos et al 1998aBastos et al , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology for collection, herborization and preservation of material followed Gradstein et al (2001), and all samples collected were deposited in SP. Identification of the species followed Frahm (1991), Sharp et al (1994), Yano & Carvalho (1995), Buck (1998), Vilas Bôas- Bastos & Bastos (1998), Bastos et al (2000), Gradstein et al (2001), Castro et al (2002), Gradstein & Costa (2003), Câmara & Costa (2006), Câmara (2008a;, Ballejos & Bastos (2009), Yano & Peralta (2009, Valente et al (2011), Yano & Peralta (2011a, Bordin & Yano (2013), Luizi-Ponzo et al (2013) and Valente et al (2013).…”
Section: Data Collection and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No Brasil, é referida para Bahia (Bastos et al, 2000), Minas Gerais (Ångstroem, 1876), Rio Grande do Sul, Acre (Lemos-Michel, 1980), Rio de Janeiro (Gottsche et al, 1844), São Paulo (Herzog, 1925) e Pernambuco (Pôrto, 1989(Pôrto, , 1990 Distribuição geográfica: apresenta distribuição neotropical. No Brasil, é citada para Amazonas (Griffin III, 1979), Ceará, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Rio Grande do Sul, Sergipe, São Paulo (Yano, 1984(Yano, , 1989(Yano, , 1995, Pernambuco (Pôrto, 1990), Rio de Janeiro (Yano & Costa, 1992), Acre (Vital & Visnadi, 1994), Bahia (Vilas Bôas- Bastos & Bastos, 1998), Paraíba (Yano, 1993), Paraná (Yano & Colletes, 2000) e Roraima (Santiago, 1997 Comentários: apresenta filídios espalhados, mais ou menos ascendente, subretangular a ovalado-truncado, constrito abaixo do ápice bífido, sinus em geral lunulado, segmentos com ponta longa e unisseriada, células com paredes finas, trigônios pouco desenvolvidos. Anfigastros conados com filídios em ambos os lados, bífidos até 2/3 do seu comprimento, com segmentos longos e finos, o dente lateral é longo, divergente (quadrífido).…”
Section: Jubulaceaeunclassified