Background
Adherence to ethical guidelines in the conduct of research is of paramount importance. This ensures that the research is conducted with integrity which in turn builds trust in the researchers and their results. However, misconduct occurs frequently in the research.
Methods
In this anonymous online cross-sectional survey, researchers from Dasman Diabetes institute were surveyed about their knowledge of and attitude toward ethics committee and research ethics practices across sectors. The study was conducted in November and December 2019 using an online Microsoft forms questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into five parts including demographics, knowledge of ethical principles and the function of ethics committee, knowledge of ethics and attitudes toward ethics committees and ethical practices. Question-formats were combination of multiple-choice, yes or no, and five-point Likert-scale formats. Researchers applied, the Chi-square test, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, ANOVA, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, the Student’s t-test, and or the Mann-Whitney U test for data analysis.
Results
The study had a response rate of 86%. Among the 55 participants of this study, 43 (78%) had prior training in research ethics. Those with maximum training were from the medical sector (82.4%) followed by the research sector (80.8%) and operations sector (66.7%). Significant association was observed between prior ethics training and different number of projects handled by a respondent. Similar significant association was noted among the trained participants on knowledge and awareness of the role of the ethics committee, ethical principles, the committee’s ways of reviewing protocol and attitude towards consenting process. However, knowledge and awareness of ethics committee and its function varied significantly across sectors and across different number of projects handled. Attitude toward ethical practices such as misconduct and manipulation of data was also found to vary significantly across sectors.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated that research sector and medical sector were aware of the knowledge and attitude toward ethics committee, its function and research ethical practices in comparison to operations sector. This indicates a gap in knowledge and attitude which can be bridged by continuous and customized ethics training based on the type of research.