2020
DOI: 10.11646/zoosymposia.19.1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p class="ZootaxaTitle"><strong>New insights in the biogeographical distributions of two Spionidae (Annelida) from the NE Atlantic and Mediterranean French coasts</strong></p>

Abstract: We report the first occurrences of Spiophanes afer Meißner, 2005 and Prionospio cristaventralis Delgado-Blas, Díaz-Díaz & Viéitez, 2018 from French marine waters (from the southern part of the Bay of Biscay in NE Atlantic, and the Gulf of Lion in the Mediterranean Sea). Morphological characters of S. afer include the presence of an occipital antenna, dorsal ciliated organs extending to chaetigers 13–15, neuropodial hooks from chaetiger 15, ventrolateral intersegmental pouches from chaetigers 14–15, chaetal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to this pattern, we found Spiophanes COI sequences from the CCZ matching a shallow water species from the Mediterranean (Spiophanes adriaticus). Such a result is difficult to explain, particularly as the two species are not morphologically similar and the validity of the Mediterranean species has been recently questioned (Jourde et al 2020). Thus, distribution results based on single gene analyses must be scrutinized carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to this pattern, we found Spiophanes COI sequences from the CCZ matching a shallow water species from the Mediterranean (Spiophanes adriaticus). Such a result is difficult to explain, particularly as the two species are not morphologically similar and the validity of the Mediterranean species has been recently questioned (Jourde et al 2020). Thus, distribution results based on single gene analyses must be scrutinized carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%