2017
DOI: 10.1038/scsandc.2017.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower extremity muscle structure in incomplete spinal cord injury: a comparison between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experimental paradigm, correlation between MG thickness and MRI-derived muscle volume (regarded as the gold-standard) robustly demonstrates the ability to accurately determine muscle size by U/S, similar to that in previous studies (Smith et al, 2017;Franchi et al, 2018). However, while TA and MG thickness and CSA have previously been linked (Smith et al, 2017), it is important to note the absence of correlation between TA volume and thickness in this study. This is likely due to the longer geometric shape and a smaller more consistent CSA of TA compared to MG (Fukunaga et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experimental paradigm, correlation between MG thickness and MRI-derived muscle volume (regarded as the gold-standard) robustly demonstrates the ability to accurately determine muscle size by U/S, similar to that in previous studies (Smith et al, 2017;Franchi et al, 2018). However, while TA and MG thickness and CSA have previously been linked (Smith et al, 2017), it is important to note the absence of correlation between TA volume and thickness in this study. This is likely due to the longer geometric shape and a smaller more consistent CSA of TA compared to MG (Fukunaga et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Use of U/S to conveniently and accurately quantify muscle mass ( Reeves et al, 2004 ) has become a ubiquitous tool to investigate muscle adaptation in health and disease ( de Boer et al, 2008 ; Nijholt et al, 2017 ; Franchi et al, 2018 ). In our experimental paradigm, correlation between MG thickness and MRI-derived muscle volume (regarded as the gold-standard) robustly demonstrates the ability to accurately determine muscle size by U/S, similar to that in previous studies ( Smith et al, 2017 ; Franchi et al, 2018 ). However, while TA and MG thickness and CSA have previously been linked ( Smith et al, 2017 ), it is important to note the absence of correlation between TA volume and thickness in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It has been previously reported that ultrasound MT is closely correlated with MRI‐measured muscle CSA in a limited number of muscle groups including the quadriceps ( r = 0·91, n = 52; Abe et al ., ), adductors ( r = 0·92, n = 20; Ogawa et al ., ), tibialis anterior ( r = 0·90, n = 17; Martinson & Stokes, ), medial and lateral gastrocnemius ( r = 0·91, n = 6 with both legs; Smith et al ., ) and the pectoralis major ( r = 0·92, n = 20; Yasuda et al ., ). However, other studies have found only moderate correlations between anterior thigh MT and mid‐thigh quadriceps muscle CSA ( r = 0·76, n = 34; Sipila & Suominen, ), between tibialis anterior MT and muscle CSA ( r = 0·58, n = 6 with both legs) and between posterior thigh MT and hamstring muscle CSA at 70% ( r = 0·68, n = 10) of the thigh length (Abe et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given the potential utility of knowing the actual muscle CSA, it is of importance to examine if a single MT measurements are related to muscle CSA in the extremity and trunk. However, there are currently only a limited number of studies investigating this (Abe et al ., , ; Smith et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MRI has traditionally been used to assess muscle architectural changes, ultrasound has been increasingly used to assess lower extremity muscles in clinical settings due to its portability and reliability compared to MRI muscle imaging [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Ultrasound is also less costly and more accessible than MRI [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%