Lower Extremity Kinematic and Kinetic Characteristics as Effects on Running Economy of Recreational Runners

Abstract

Purpose Determine associations between running economy (RE) and running sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic parameters. Method A total of thirty male recreational runners (age: 21.21 ± 1.22 years, VO2max: 54.61 ± 5.42 ml·kg-1·min-1) participated in two separate test sessions. In the first session, the participant’s body composition and RE at 10 and 12 km·h-1 were measured. In the second session, measurements were taken for the sagittal plane of hip, knee, and ankle angles and range of motion (ROM), as well as ground reaction force. Results Moderate correlations were found between lower energy costs at 12 km·h-1 and smaller hip flexion at toe-off (r = 0.373) as well as smaller peak hip flexion during stance (r = 0.397). During the swing phase, lower energy costs at 10 km·h-1 were moderately correlated with smaller peak knee flexion and smaller knee flexion and extension ROM (r = 0.366 ~ 0.443). Lower energy costs at 12 km·h-1 were moderately correlated with smaller peak hip and knee flexion as well as knee extension ROM (r = 0.369 ~ 0.427). In terms of kinetics, there was a moderate correlation between higher energy costs at 10 km·h-1 and larger peak active force, as well as larger peak braking and propulsion force (r = -0.470 ~ 0.488). Lower energy costs at 12 km·h-1 were moderately to largely correlated with smaller peak impact and braking force (r = 0.486 and -0.500, respectively). Regarding the statistical parametric mapping analysis, most outcomes showed associations with RE at 10 km·h-1, including knee flexion (42.5% ~ 65.5% of the gait cycle), ankle plantarflexion (32.5% ~ 36% of the gait cycle), active force (30.5% ~ 35% of the stance phase), and propulsion force (68% ~ 72.5% of the stance phase). Lower energy costs at 12 km·h-1 were correlated with smaller hip flexion (5.5% ~ 12% and 66.5% ~ 74%) and smaller knee flexion (57% ~ 57.5%) during the running gait cycle. Conclusions This study indicates that biomechanical factors are associated with RE in recreational runners. To design effective training methods to improve RE, coaches and runners should focus on the sagittal plane kinematics of the hip, knee, and ankle, as well as lower vertical and horizontal kinetic parameters.