2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-velocity impact damage accumulation in woven S2-glass composite systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These damage mechanisms are rather different from those reported in 2D woven composites [9,15,[21][22][23]. To illustrate these differences, various cross-sections of the 2D_S2 laminate impacted with 240 J are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Z-yarn Debondingmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These damage mechanisms are rather different from those reported in 2D woven composites [9,15,[21][22][23]. To illustrate these differences, various cross-sections of the 2D_S2 laminate impacted with 240 J are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Z-yarn Debondingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, delamination damage -as in 2D composites -also occurred at high strain rates or high penetration depths. Baucom and Zikry [8,9] explored the behavior under impact of glass fiber 2D and 3D composites with optical and scanning electron microscopy, which allowed a better insight of the damage micromechanisms. They concluded that the larger energy absorption of the 3D composites was due to the following mechanisms activated by the z-yarns: extensive straining of the z-yarns, z-yarn fracture and surface weft tows pulled through unbroken crimp of the z-yarns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that no significant differences existed in the force, energy curves and damage parameter for tests, in which no perforation happened. Baucom et al [9,10] examined the damage progression and the absorption and dissipation of energy in 2D and 3D woven E-and S2-glass composites subjected to repeated impact up to the moment of complete perforation. It was reported that the 3D systems survived more strikes before perforating; thus absorbing more impact energy than the 2D laminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gama et al (2005) studied ballistic performance of S-2 glass 3DNCOW composites. Baucom et al (2006) investigated low-velocity impact damage of S-2 glass 3DNCOW composites.…”
Section: Dynamic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%