2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab25d4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy neutrino scattering in experiment and astrophysics

Abstract: We review the relevance of neutrino-nucleus interactions at energy transfers below 100 MeV for accelerator-based experiments, experiments at lower energies and for astrophysical neutrinos. The impact of low-energy scattering processes in the energy reconstruction analysis of oscillation experiments is investigated. We discuss the modeling of coherent scattering processes and compare its strength to that of inelastic interactions. The presented results are obtained within a continuum random phase approximation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although inherently non-relativistic, the calculations are effectively relativized according to the scheme of [37]. The HF-CRPA provides reliable results for very low momentum transfers where long-range correlations, that are not accounted for in a mean-field picture, contribute significantly to the cross section in the form of, e.g., giant resonances [38]. This consistent treatment of the interaction from very low to moderate momentum transfers is important for neutrino-oscillation analyses that need to provide an adequate description of the electroweak interaction with nuclei over a broad region of phase space.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although inherently non-relativistic, the calculations are effectively relativized according to the scheme of [37]. The HF-CRPA provides reliable results for very low momentum transfers where long-range correlations, that are not accounted for in a mean-field picture, contribute significantly to the cross section in the form of, e.g., giant resonances [38]. This consistent treatment of the interaction from very low to moderate momentum transfers is important for neutrino-oscillation analyses that need to provide an adequate description of the electroweak interaction with nuclei over a broad region of phase space.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of them are applicable to energies higher than those corresponding to the quasielastic peak, and account for pion production and resonance excitations [32][33][34][35][36]. Others are suitable to model the low-energy region of the response functions characterized by peaks corresponding to collective modes and transitions to discrete excited states [37,38]. However, it is fair to note that they rely on a somewhat approximate description of nuclear dynamics that does not fully capture correlation effects in both the initial and final states and does not generally use as inputs realistic nuclear interactions and consistent electroweak currents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The v and W factors are representing the lepton kinematic factors and the nuclear responses, the latter encoding the HF-CRPA effects as described in the previous paragraph, expressions for both can be found in Ref. [51]. The combination of the vector-axialvector (V − A) structure of the weak interaction, strong isospin symmetry, and (anti) neutrinos in practice being (positive) negative helicity eigenstates, gives rise to the fact that for reactions off a nucleon, the difference between neutrino and antineutrino induced interactions is simply accounted for by a change of sign of the axial current.…”
Section: Neutrino Versus Antineutrino Induced Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%