1977
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/10/7/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy electron diffraction analysis of clean Fe (001)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
15
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
10
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the experimental and the calculated results were found to be in excellent agreement with those reported by Legg et al [8] and are therefore not repeated here. The topmost interlayer spacing is slightly reduced (by about 1.5%) with respect to the bulk value: A minimum averaged reliability factor r = 0.15 was determined for four beams, using the r-factor program by Zanazzi and Jona [ 141. The formation of the N overlayer causes not only the appearance of new fractional-order beams, but also affects the I-V spectra from the integral-order beams.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the experimental and the calculated results were found to be in excellent agreement with those reported by Legg et al [8] and are therefore not repeated here. The topmost interlayer spacing is slightly reduced (by about 1.5%) with respect to the bulk value: A minimum averaged reliability factor r = 0.15 was determined for four beams, using the r-factor program by Zanazzi and Jona [ 141. The formation of the N overlayer causes not only the appearance of new fractional-order beams, but also affects the I-V spectra from the integral-order beams.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Its optimum value found was I$ = 9.5 eV, whereby no correction for the work function difference is taken into account. The imaginary part of the inner potential was set equal to 0.85E 'I3 [eV], which yielded better agreement between theory and experiment than the smaller value of approximately 0.7E"" [eV] as used by Legg et al [8] in a study of the clean Fe(100) surface. No further efforts were made to optimize this as well as other non-structural parameters.…”
Section: Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated relaxations and magnetic moments for the first layers of the Fe(100) surface are given in Table 2 with a comparison with other available literature values. [23][24][25] As given in Tables 1 and 2, our calculated properties for bulk Fe and Fe(100) surface are in good agreement with other theoretical and experimental values. …”
Section: Fe Bulk and Fe(100) Surfacesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The comparison of unpublished experimental LEED I (V ) data for Fe(100) and theoretical best-fit LEED I (V ) curves of five different beams of the Fe(100) surface is shown in figure 3. Our study indicates a contraction of the first Fe-Fe layer of 10 ± 2% that is substantially larger than the 0-3% estimate for the Fe(100) surface contraction obtained by Legg et al [56]. This new estimate of the surface layer contraction for Fe(100) comes from a fitting to the LEED I (V ) data following the procedure of Clarke [53,57], with an extremely good R-factor fitting, as summarized in figure 4.…”
Section: Determination Of the Mo(112) Surface Structuresupporting
confidence: 52%