2005
Low-Dose Retinoids in the Prevention of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Organ Transplant Recipients
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
125
10
6
0
Citation Types
7
90
0
2
Year Published
2000
2026
Publication Types
Select...
97
32
7
Relationship
2
134
Authors
Journals
Cited by 135 publications
(99 citation statements)
References 26 publications
7
90
0
2
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our analyses also correlated increasing age with higher KC rate, but this was not significant. Other studies have shown that age (≥ 55 years vs < 55 years) had no major effect on retinoid efficacy 10 . We found time since transplantation did not impact acitretin effect, consistent with prior literature 10 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our analyses also correlated increasing age with higher KC rate, but this was not significant. Other studies have shown that age (≥ 55 years vs < 55 years) had no major effect on retinoid efficacy 10 . We found time since transplantation did not impact acitretin effect, consistent with prior literature 10 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other studies have shown that age (≥ 55 years vs < 55 years) had no major effect on retinoid efficacy. 10 We found time since transplantation did not impact acitretin effect, consistent with prior literature. 10 Acitretin dosing in our cohort, titrated according to clinical benefit and side effects, was at a median of 10 mg daily, lower than most studies, which included doses up to 50 mg daily.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Tumours larger than 2 cm in diameter have double the local recurrence rate and triple the metastatic rate compared with smaller tumours. 19 In our study group, all but two patients' index SCC were smaller than 2 cm and, with only a single recurrence recorded, these results support the size association.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 82%
