2011
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐dimensional‐structure self‐learning and thresholding: Regularization beyond compressed sensing for MRI Reconstruction

Abstract: An improved image reconstruction method from undersampled k-space data, “LOw-dimensional-structure Self-learning and Thresholding (LOST),” which utilizes the structure from the underlying image is presented. A low resolution image from the fully-sampled k-space center is reconstructed to learn image patches of similar anatomical characteristics. These patches are arranged into “similarity clusters,” which are subsequently processed for de-aliasing and artifact removal, using underlying low-dimensional properti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
137
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and thresholding (LOST) (20). This technique uses patient-and anatomicspecific information from low-spatialresolution images reconstructed from the fully sampled central k-space data to adaptively generate a sparse representation for the undersampled image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and thresholding (LOST) (20). This technique uses patient-and anatomicspecific information from low-spatialresolution images reconstructed from the fully sampled central k-space data to adaptively generate a sparse representation for the undersampled image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique uses patient-and anatomicspecific information from low-spatialresolution images reconstructed from the fully sampled central k-space data to adaptively generate a sparse representation for the undersampled image. This reconstruction reduces blurring artifacts associated with conventional compressed sensing reconstruction for high-spatial-resolution cardiac MR imaging (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CS-MRI reconstruction algorithms tend to fall into two categories: Those which enforce sparsity withing an imagelevel transform domain (e.g., [3]- [7]), and those which en- force sparsity on a patch-level (e.g., [8]- [11]). Most CS-MRI reconstruction algorithms belong to the first category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, as also illustrated, the tracked blocks are gathered into a 3D cluster and rearranged into a 2D matrix, where each block becomes one column and blocks corresponding to separate time points are placed into separate columns. The 2D matrix is then 24 subject to SVD to exploit low-rank sparsity. The 2D matrix is expected to have greater spatiotemporal sparsity compared to the whole image or to untracked blocks because the blocks have a smaller scope with decreased spatiotemporal variations, and motion tracking leads to less motion contamination.…”
Section: Blosm Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies matrix rank sparsity was applied to the entire image dataset. In addition, recent studies such as Low-dimensional-structure Selflearning and thresholding (LOST) (24,62) and compartment-based k-t Principal Component…”
Section: Regional Sparsitymentioning
confidence: 99%