Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Steam Generator Tubes under Axial Loading

Abstract

Compared with the fatigue properties of the material (Inconel Alloy 690), the real fatigue lives of tubes are more meaningful in the fatigue design and assessment of steam generator (SG) tube bundles. However, it is almost impossible to get a satisfactory result by conducting fatigue tests on the tube directly. A tube with a uniform and thin wall easily fails near the clamping ends under cyclic loading due to the stress concentration. In this research, a set-up for fatigue tests of real tubes is proposed to overcome the stress concentration. With the set-up, low cycle fatigue tests were conducted in accordance with an existing fatigue design curve for Alloy 690. Strain control mode was applied with fully reversed push–pull loading under different strain amplitudes (0.15%, 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4%). A favourable result was obtained, and the low cycle fatigue behavior was investigated. The results showed that the fatigue life tested by the real tube was below the strain–life curve of Alloy 690 which was fitted by conventional solid specimens. A cyclic hardening behavior was found by the cyclic stress–strain curve when compared with the monotonic stress–strain curve.

Fatigue Life Prediction of Steam Generator Tubes by Tube Specimens with Circular Holes

“…In order to obtain the local stress-strain state around the notch, elastic analysis and elastoplastic analysis were carried out respectively. Meanwhile, the cyclic stress-strain relation of material for elastoplastic analysis is described by Ramberg-Osgood model [20]:…”

Investigation of Strain Fatigue Behavior for Inconel 625 with Laser Shock Peening

“…The results show that the cyclic stress response of 2205 is primary cyclic hardening followed by long-term cyclic softening, while 316 L shows secondary hardening at larger strain amplitudes. Xing et al [ 12 ] investigated the fatigue properties of Inconel 690. The results of cyclic stress–strain response investigation showed that the response strongly depended on strain amplitude.…”

Comparative Analysis of Fatigue Energy Characteristics of S355J2 Steel Subjected to Multi-Axis Loads

“…Non-monotonic alternation of stress states may lead to permanent changes in the structure of materials and is often the cause of the limited functionality of components. The vast majority of machines and engineering structures are subjected to complex and time-varying operational loads [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Generally, the loads can be dynamic, i.e., caused by forces and moments varying in time.…”