2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low cost electrocoagulation process for treatment of contaminated water using aluminium electrodes from recycled cans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saleem et al (2011) found the allowable limits of BOD in the wastewater at 24.7 mA/cm2 current density. Idusuyi et al (2022) noted that optimum COD and BOD removal efficacy of 90.7% and 97.67% were found at 10 V. Data showed that the greatest removal of TSS was received by <3 for SBC, 1 SRG, 80 for SCC, 1 for PMTF and 1 mg/L for SMH at 21 volt as compared with 89,46,1760,38 and 54 mg/L at 0 volt, respectively. It was observed that the highest removal of turbidity (NTU) was observed up to <1 for SBC, 5 SRG, 55 for SCC, <1 for PMTF and 2 NTU for SMH at 21 volt as compared to 106, 148, 830, 23 and 58 NTU at 0 volt, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Saleem et al (2011) found the allowable limits of BOD in the wastewater at 24.7 mA/cm2 current density. Idusuyi et al (2022) noted that optimum COD and BOD removal efficacy of 90.7% and 97.67% were found at 10 V. Data showed that the greatest removal of TSS was received by <3 for SBC, 1 SRG, 80 for SCC, 1 for PMTF and 1 mg/L for SMH at 21 volt as compared with 89,46,1760,38 and 54 mg/L at 0 volt, respectively. It was observed that the highest removal of turbidity (NTU) was observed up to <1 for SBC, 5 SRG, 55 for SCC, <1 for PMTF and 2 NTU for SMH at 21 volt as compared to 106, 148, 830, 23 and 58 NTU at 0 volt, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other techniques show metal treatment efficiency such as membrane technology [42]. The benefits of using electrocoagulation method are low costs [43], little energy [44] and the possibility of eliminating a wide range of pollutants [45]. Biological treatment, fenton oxidation, membrane separation and physiochemical treatment have some major disadvantages, such as their high operational costs, higher sludge formation, long retention time and production of toxic byproducts [46][47][48].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of electrocoagulation is already known for treating wastewater, such as recycling water contaminated by domestic sewage [38]. The advantages of this method The success of electrocoagulation is already known for treating wastewater, such as recycling water contaminated by domestic sewage [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of electrocoagulation is already known for treating wastewater, such as recycling water contaminated by domestic sewage [38]. The advantages of this method The success of electrocoagulation is already known for treating wastewater, such as recycling water contaminated by domestic sewage [38]. The advantages of this method over others that use an electric current to coagulate suspended solids in contaminated water are a reduction in energy consumption and a reduction in operating costs [36,38,42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%