2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low carbon scenarios for transport in India: Co-benefits analysis

Abstract: Dependence on oil for transport is a concern for India's policymakers on three countsenergy security, local environment and climate change. Rapid urbanisation and accompanying motorisation has created some of the most polluting cities in India and rising demand for oil is leading to higher imports, besides causing more CO 2 emissions. The government of India wants to achieve the climate goals through a sustainability approach that simultaneously addresses other environment and developmental challenges. This pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transport policies designed to avert climate change show co-benefits for air pollution mitigation [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]; however, they also present conflicts. A well-known case is the shift to diesel cars, which not only delivered less CO 2 reductions than expected [29,30] but also increased air pollution.…”
Section: Climate Change and Air Pollution: Co-benefits And Conflicts mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport policies designed to avert climate change show co-benefits for air pollution mitigation [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]; however, they also present conflicts. A well-known case is the shift to diesel cars, which not only delivered less CO 2 reductions than expected [29,30] but also increased air pollution.…”
Section: Climate Change and Air Pollution: Co-benefits And Conflicts mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often claimed that transport is one of the hardest sectors to decarbonize . This view is challenged by a number of more recent papers, which show that an integrated policy approach can address the creation cobenefits with other key policy objectives, such as health, productivity, energy security, and safety, which can lead to a maximum of socioeconomic benefits . These synergies between policy objectives have the potential to incorporate the positions of relevant veto players, which can help form coalitions to support policy implementation …”
Section: Climate Change Policies Cobenefits and Coalitions To Decarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,35,36 This view is challenged by a number of more recent papers, which show that an integrated policy approach can address the creation cobenefits with other key policy objectives, such as health, productivity, energy security, and safety, which can lead to a maximum of socioeconomic benefits. [37][38][39][40][41] These synergies between policy objectives have the potential to incorporate the positions of relevant veto players, which can help form coalitions to support policy implementation. 42 If applied in isolation, policy measures are unlikely to achieve goals without generating trade offs that create the risk of a veto player blocking the implementation process.…”
Section: Potential For Cobenefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MARKAL is an optimization mathematical model for analyzing the energy system and has a rich characterization of technology and fuel mix at end-use level while maintaining consistency with system constraints such as energy supply, demand, investment, and emissions (Loulou et al 2004). The ANSWER-MARKAL model framework has been used extensively for India (Shukla et al 2008Dhar and Shukla 2015). AIM/CGE and GCAM are top-down, computable general equilibrium (CGE), models used to compute the GDP loss and CO 2 price for the 2 C stabilization scenario.…”
Section: Assessment Methodology and Model Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%