2019
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2019.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost in trait space: species-poor communities are inflexible in properties that drive ecosystem functioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
3
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…morphological traits of leaves and roots were orthogonal) were subsequently analysed separately. The LES included CWM for SLA, LDMC and leaf N concentration similar to Vogel et al (2019). Using species-level traits as the input for the PCA and then weighting the PCA scores by species relative abundance resulted in similar CWM trait values (R 2 = 0.98, details not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…morphological traits of leaves and roots were orthogonal) were subsequently analysed separately. The LES included CWM for SLA, LDMC and leaf N concentration similar to Vogel et al (2019). Using species-level traits as the input for the PCA and then weighting the PCA scores by species relative abundance resulted in similar CWM trait values (R 2 = 0.98, details not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental change often affects the composition of communities by altering the environmental conditions, modifying available niche space directly (niche destruction; Harpole et al., 2016) and/or indirectly through altered biotic interactions (Turnbull et al, 2016). For instance, the addition of nutrients has been repeatedly shown to favor the growth of certain plant species with high nutritional demands and fast uptake strategies (Clark et al, 2007; Harpole and Tilman, 2007; Harpole et al, 2016; Vogel et al, 2019a this issue ). Increased plant growth of some species, in turn, induces the shading of other species, which then disappear because their niche requirements are no longer met (Hautier et al, 2009).…”
Section: What Are the Key Challenges Of Future Bef Research?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential cascading effects of community diversity on population diversity and eventually intra-specific and phylogenetic diversity as well as consequences for ecosystem functioning are poorly studied (but see Crutsinger et al, 2006; Hughes et al., 2008; Zeng et al, 2017). In fact, there has been a recent interest in how populations assemble with respect to functional diversity, but also phylogenetic diversity, and the underlying mechanisms are relevant in the BEF context as community assembly and disassembly processes have implications for the long-term functioning of plant communities (Vogel et al, 2019a this issue ). Species differ partly due to divergent directional selection.…”
Section: What Are the Key Challenges Of Future Bef Research?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution to this problem is the use of species traits, as species sharing similar traits have been shown to respond consistently to land-use change (6,7). Furthermore, in agricultural landscapes, trait diversity plays an important role in determining the capacity of ecosystems to cope with future environmental changes (8) and secure the provision of key ecosystem services. However, the long-term response of functional diversity to land-use changes is unknown as previous studies investigating the effects of land-use history have focused on species richness (3,9), ignoring trait diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%