Reading Lost 2009
DOI: 10.5040/9780755697137.ch-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost in a Great Story: Evaluation in Narrative Television (and Television Studies)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the show appropriated a ludic narrative logic designed to cultivate a puzzle-solving mentality in its audience right from the start (Bakioğlu, 2014). In so doing, they cultivated what Jason Mittell identifies as a form of storytelling that ‘promotes a model of “forensic fandom”, a mode of television engagement encouraging research, collaboration, analysis, and interpretation’ (Mittell, 2009a: 128–130; Mittell, 2009b, n.d.). In Mittell’s formulation, forensic fandom embraces a detective mentality to seek out clues, patterns, and information that lead to the formulation of theories about the show and encourages a form of engagement that he refers to as drillable media .…”
Section: Truth Lies and Videos: Building A Social Media Franchise Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the show appropriated a ludic narrative logic designed to cultivate a puzzle-solving mentality in its audience right from the start (Bakioğlu, 2014). In so doing, they cultivated what Jason Mittell identifies as a form of storytelling that ‘promotes a model of “forensic fandom”, a mode of television engagement encouraging research, collaboration, analysis, and interpretation’ (Mittell, 2009a: 128–130; Mittell, 2009b, n.d.). In Mittell’s formulation, forensic fandom embraces a detective mentality to seek out clues, patterns, and information that lead to the formulation of theories about the show and encourages a form of engagement that he refers to as drillable media .…”
Section: Truth Lies and Videos: Building A Social Media Franchise Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some within the fandom focus on the creative challenge of drawing inferences and guesswork and enjoy advances, leaks, theories, and rumors (Johnson and Rosenbaum, 2017 ; Völcker, 2017 ). Mittell ( 2009 ) uses the concept of forensic fandom to describe the long-term commitment experienced by users who dissect the canon and immerse themselves in the deepest interpretative layers. He states that being a follower of these narratives implies:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to embrace a detective mentality, seeking out clues, charting patterns, and assembling evidence into narrative hypotheses and theories. This forensic engagement finds a natural home in online forums, where viewers gather to posit theories and debate interpretations, and fan wikis (Mittell, 2009 , pp. 14–15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, the experience of watching television where each episode largely exists in isolation and does not require other episodes in order to be coherent, such as in sitcoms like Married with Children (Moye and Leavitt, 1987) or shows like ER (Crichton, 1994), is fundamentally different to something like Lost (Abrams, 2004) or Veronica Mars (Thomas, 2004). The reason for the difference in the modes of engagement is that the latter cases are part of what Jason Mittell refers to as ‘forensic fandom’, where understanding the story requires the audience take on a ‘detective mentality’ as they engage with the text (Mittell, 2006: 35, 2009a: 128–129, 2009b: 2.3; Veale, 2013). Currently, approaches to critical analysis do not account for how textual structure can shape the processes required to negotiate a given text, or how those processes themselves have an affective dimension that influences the experience of the story.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%