2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2032858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss Separation in Nonoriented Electrical Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The understanding of the Epstein technique is also limited by the absence of a 3-D model, which properly incorporates domain wall dynamics into total loss calculations [1]. Furthermore, a standard approach is to express total loss as the sum of hysteresis, bulk eddy current and an excess term, which compensates for the observed total loss [1,9]. However, this approach ignores the influence of domain wall dynamics on magnetization processes and loss mechanisms [1,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The understanding of the Epstein technique is also limited by the absence of a 3-D model, which properly incorporates domain wall dynamics into total loss calculations [1]. Furthermore, a standard approach is to express total loss as the sum of hysteresis, bulk eddy current and an excess term, which compensates for the observed total loss [1,9]. However, this approach ignores the influence of domain wall dynamics on magnetization processes and loss mechanisms [1,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative description of hysteresis and eddy currents inside a ferromagnetic lamination is achieved by solving a 1D magnetodynamic problem with hysteresis [1,3], which involves the following quantities: the magnetic field strength h, the magnetic flux density b and the electric field strength e. Considering an individual lamination of thickness 2d with an upper surface normal vector n = (0, 0, 1), the domain of analysis ω is a line parallel to n, across half the thickness and far from the edges, Fig. 1.…”
Section: D Cross Lamination Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intricate problem is of critical importance for the design of modern electrical drives but also for understanding morphological effects in magnetic properties. The complexity of this question is because of different factors [1,2]. Iron losses are the macroscopic outcome of a combination of micro-or mesoscopic level physical phenomena [2,3]: namely, eddy currents, skin effect, saturation and hysteresis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such models, there are basically single components of hysteresis, eddy current and excess losses [2][3][4] specified. Specific empiric factors calibrate such formula to the particular material operated at defined frequency and polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%