2014
DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.19712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of desiccation tolerance in Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. seeds during germination

Abstract: This study evaluated the loss of desiccation tolerance in C. langsdorffii seeds during the germination process. Seeds were imbibed for 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 hours and dried to the initial moisture content, kept in this state for 3 days after which they were submitted to pre-humidification and rehydration. Ultraestructural evaluations were done aiming to observe the cell damage caused by the dry process. Desiccation tolerance was evaluated in terms of the percentage of normal seedlings. Seeds not submitt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The membrane shift accompanied by cell death have been broadly reported in the literature. Pereira et al (2014) also observed cell collapse and plasmatic membrane shift in Copaifera langsdorffii seeds imbibed by 144 hours e dehydrated.…”
Section: Ultrastructure Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The membrane shift accompanied by cell death have been broadly reported in the literature. Pereira et al (2014) also observed cell collapse and plasmatic membrane shift in Copaifera langsdorffii seeds imbibed by 144 hours e dehydrated.…”
Section: Ultrastructure Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Masetto et al (2014) observed that Sesbania virgata seeds become intolerant to desiccation when protruded radicle reaches 2 mm while Cedrela fissilis did not tolerate desiccation in any radicle length. In studies with Copaifera langsdorffii seeds, Pereira et al (2014) verified that desiccation tolerance loss began at the end of the stage I and it was complete by the middle of stage II of germination.…”
Section: Imbibition Curve and Imbibition And Desiccation Tolerance Lossmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The point during germination when DT is lost varies among species. For example, within legume species, Copaifera langsdorfii and Pisum sativum lose DT before radicle protrusion (Pereira et al, 2014;Reisdorph and Koster, 1999), while Glycine max, Medicago truncatula and Peltophorum dubium lose DT after radicle protrusion (Buitink et al, 2003;Guimarães et al, 2011;Senaratna and McKersie, 1983). Here it is shown that S. virgata (also a legume) seeds lose DT progressively after radicle protrusion (Figure 2), being almost completely sensitive when the protruded radicle length reaches 5 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Germinating orthodox seeds have been used in studies on the loss of desiccation tolerance to understand the mechanisms linked to desiccation tolerance (Reisdorph and Koster, 1999;Daws et al, 2007;Pereira et al, 2014;Maia et al, 2016). Those studies have been diverse, ranging from physiological and structural characterizations (Reisdorph and Koster, 1999;Guimarães et al, 2011;Pereira et al, 2014) to molecular and ecological analysis (Maia et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2016;Guimarães et al, 2016;Marques et al, 2017). Furthermore, desiccation tolerance reestablishment studies have been carried out to reactivate the mechanisms lost during the germination process (Buitink et al, 2003;Faria et al, 2005;Vieira et al, 2010;Maia et al, 2011;Masetto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some species that produce orthodox seeds, such as Senna multijuga, Cecropia longipes, Luehea seemannii, and Ochroma pyramidale, drying of the seeds before the conclusion of the germination process resulted in seed death (Daws et al, 2007;Rodrigues-Junior et al, 2014). Drying of the seeds at imbibition phase 1 is lethal in Copaifera langsdorffii (Pereira et al, 2014) and neotropical seed species (Daws et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%