2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of coolant accident analyses on Tehran research reactor by RELAP5/MOD3.2 code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of channels in the core was also found to be important to refine the calculation results (Reis et al, 2012). Other studies assessed several thermalhydraulic codes, including RELAP5, against an MTR-type reactor for a steady state condition, loss of flow, and loss of coolant transient (Abdelrazek et al, 2014;Chatzidakis et al, 2014;Chatzidakis et al, 2013;Hedayat et al, 2007;Karimpour & Esteki, 2015). In those studies, the RELAP5 code was generally able to simulate the steady state condition with good agreement but with a higher discrepancy during the transient considered in the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of channels in the core was also found to be important to refine the calculation results (Reis et al, 2012). Other studies assessed several thermalhydraulic codes, including RELAP5, against an MTR-type reactor for a steady state condition, loss of flow, and loss of coolant transient (Abdelrazek et al, 2014;Chatzidakis et al, 2014;Chatzidakis et al, 2013;Hedayat et al, 2007;Karimpour & Esteki, 2015). In those studies, the RELAP5 code was generally able to simulate the steady state condition with good agreement but with a higher discrepancy during the transient considered in the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling method predicts the thermal hydraulic behavior of the reactor in detail and evaluate the thermal feedback effects and also to simulate accident scenarios [7].This techniques incorporates to simulates transient which involves symmetric core spatial power distribution and strong feedback effects between neutronics and thermal hydraulic .It deals with reactivity initiated accidents with local core effects, coupled reactor core and plant dynamic interactions [3].The postulated accident that can be simulate safely includes control rod with drawl [8],loss of coolant accident [9],main steam line break accidents etc because during the accidents, deformation in the radial and axial power distribution can occurs in core [10,11].…”
Section: Neutronic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these computational tools or codes are initially developed for a nuclear power reactor, such as RELAP5, ATHLET and CATHARE codes. However, several study have been done to assess the applicability of these codes for different type of research reactors, especially MTR type [3][4][5][6], TRIGA type [7], and also for other nuclear test facilities [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%