2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2017.2652466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Study of Automatic Face Recognition

Abstract: The two underlying premises of automatic face recognition are uniqueness and permanence. This paper investigates the permanence property by addressing the following: Does face recognition ability of state-of-the-art systems degrade with elapsed time between enrolled and query face images? If so, what is the rate of decline w.r.t. the elapsed time? While previous studies have reported degradations in accuracy, no formal statistical analysis of large-scale longitudinal data has been conducted. We conduct such an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in Table 6 and Fig. 14, face verification confidence decreases as the time elapsed between two images increases, which conforms to the physical effect of face aging [27] [28]. It may also explain the better performance achieved on CACD in this evaluation, where the maximum mean age gap between the input and synthesized age cluster is 23.09 years, far less than that of 28.61 years achieved on MORPH.…”
Section: Experiments Ii: Aging Model Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, in Table 6 and Fig. 14, face verification confidence decreases as the time elapsed between two images increases, which conforms to the physical effect of face aging [27] [28]. It may also explain the better performance achieved on CACD in this evaluation, where the maximum mean age gap between the input and synthesized age cluster is 23.09 years, far less than that of 28.61 years achieved on MORPH.…”
Section: Experiments Ii: Aging Model Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Five-fold cross validation is conducted to simulate aged faces. On CACD, each fold contains 400 individuals with nearly 10,079, 8,635, 7,964, and 6,011 face images from the four age clusters of [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], and [51-60] years, respectively; Fig. 7: Aging effects obtained on the CACD databases for 24 different subjects.…”
Section: Experiments I: Aging Effect Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can observe that aging features have the most significant impact on both the identification accuracy and mAP compared to the race and gender features for MORPH II and FERET datasets. This is because aging features are heterogeneous in nature, i.e., more person-specific [36] thus helpful in recognizing face images across aging. In contrast, race and gender features are more population-specific and less person specific, as suggested in [3,4].…”
Section: Results Related Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a sizable amount of literature on recognition of age-separated face images, such as [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The existing methods can be categorized as generative or discriminative.…”
Section: Recognition and Retrieval Of Face Images Across Aging Variatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A local feature-based multiview discriminative learning (MDL) approach is presented in (20). More recently, the effects of facial aging on recognition performance across a large population have been studied in (21). Despite the state-of-the-art performance, these approaches exhibit two main limitations: (i) lack of facial feature evaluations with temporal variations and (ii) a lack of discriminative information because most of these methods utilize a single set of facial features.…”
Section: Recognition Of Age-separated Face Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%