2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal evaluation of dental arch asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3-dimensional digital models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of lower jaw growth during adolescence thus depends significantly on the symmetry of the lower face. These findings from our cross‐sectional study and inference from prevalence data on growth are consistent with a longitudinal growth study which reported that occlusal asymmetries do not improve or worsen with growth (Veli, Yuksel, & Uysal, ). Growth patterns are largely an inherited characteristic therefore suggesting once again that that prognathism and retrognathism, when symmetric, are inherited characteristic and that lower jaw asymmetries are acquired characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The extent of lower jaw growth during adolescence thus depends significantly on the symmetry of the lower face. These findings from our cross‐sectional study and inference from prevalence data on growth are consistent with a longitudinal growth study which reported that occlusal asymmetries do not improve or worsen with growth (Veli, Yuksel, & Uysal, ). Growth patterns are largely an inherited characteristic therefore suggesting once again that that prognathism and retrognathism, when symmetric, are inherited characteristic and that lower jaw asymmetries are acquired characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the prevalence of asymmetric, that is unilateral retrognathia or prognathia, does not increase or decrease after age 12. A similar lack of age‐related changes in mandibular and facial asymmetry in adolescent patients has been reported . However, Melnik has reported improvement in asymmetry from age 6 to 12 years and also found left side dominance in mandibular size at young ages .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A similar lack of age-related changes in mandibular and facial asymmetry in adolescent patients has been reported. 29,30 However, Melnik has reported improvement in asymmetry from age 6 to 12 years and also found left side dominance in mandibular size at young ages. 31 In our foetal specimens, the mandible does not appear to be a site where significant DA or FA is evident ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Veli ve ark.nın yaptığı çalışmada, sınıf II subdivizyona sahip hastalarda dental orta hat sapmalarının görülebildiği ve bu durumun büyüme ile değişmediği bildirilmiştir. 28 Yapılan çalışmalarda belirtildiği gibi, dental orta hat sapmaları ve dişsel maloklüzyonlar arasında bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir, ancak dental orta hat sapması ve iskeletsel maloklüzyon arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen bir çalışmaya literatürde rastlanılmamıştır. Bu çalışmada, maksiller orta hat diastemasının ve dental orta hat sapmasının farklı iskeletsel maloklüzyonlar ile ilişkisi araştırılmıştır.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified