2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term tests of a Jülich planar short stack with reversible solid oxide cells in both fuel cell and electrolysis modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
83
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
83
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this result would lie in an easier diffusion process of H 2 /H 2 O in a porous electrode compared to CO/CO 2 and in a higher charge transfer for the steam reduction. Furthermore, degradation rates seem to be impacted by the electrolyzer operating mode, as investigated by Nguyen et al [19]. These authors compared the voltage evolution of a two Ni-YSZ/YSZ/CGO/LSCF cells stack operating in H 2 O electrolysis, CO 2 electrolysis and co-electrolysis, and showed that the voltage degradation is a little higher in co-electrolysis compared to steam electrolysis (at 760°C and 15% fuel utilization, degradations rates comprised between 0.5 and 1.5%/1,000 h for 50/50 vol.% H 2 O/H 2 steam electrolysis and between 1.0 and 6.1%/1,000 h (DU/U) for 25/25/50 vol.% H 2 O/CO 2 /H 2 co-electrolysis were measured).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for this result would lie in an easier diffusion process of H 2 /H 2 O in a porous electrode compared to CO/CO 2 and in a higher charge transfer for the steam reduction. Furthermore, degradation rates seem to be impacted by the electrolyzer operating mode, as investigated by Nguyen et al [19]. These authors compared the voltage evolution of a two Ni-YSZ/YSZ/CGO/LSCF cells stack operating in H 2 O electrolysis, CO 2 electrolysis and co-electrolysis, and showed that the voltage degradation is a little higher in co-electrolysis compared to steam electrolysis (at 760°C and 15% fuel utilization, degradations rates comprised between 0.5 and 1.5%/1,000 h for 50/50 vol.% H 2 O/H 2 steam electrolysis and between 1.0 and 6.1%/1,000 h (DU/U) for 25/25/50 vol.% H 2 O/CO 2 /H 2 co-electrolysis were measured).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few models have been dedicated to the co-electrolysis of CO 2 and H 2 O. Thermodynamic investigations have also been carried out on the effect of temperature, pressure, and inlet composition on the outlet gas and performances [19,30]. After investigating CO 2 electrolysis [31], Ni et al [20,32] have recently developed a kinetic model taking into account the CO 2 electro-reduction and the reverse WGS reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• at the Julich research center, a two-cell planar stack was operated for 4000 h in fuel cell mode, for 3450 h in steam electrolysis and for 640 h in co-electrolysis modes [34]; • Sar et al [35] made similar tests with different materials for a shorter time (430 h as SOEC and 350 as SOFC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those cells were chosen since their reliability has been proven in long-term tests in both SOFC and SOEC modes as mentioned above [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much progress on the SOEC technology has been achieved for hydrogen production, for example as regards the electrochemical performance and the durability of the cell and stack, electrode and electrolyte materials, and modeling of SOEC systems [5][6][7][8][9]. Furthermore, the SOEC technology is not only focused on water electrolysis for hydrogen production, but also on co-electrolysis of water and carbon dioxide for syngas and carbon fuels generation [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%