2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term safety and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy: Results of a 1-year open-label extension study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
56
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lacosamide was well tolerated during this 8-year OLE trial, with 12.7% of patients discontinuing because of TEAEs, which lies within the range observed for other OLE studies of AEDs between 1 and 8 years of duration [9,10,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Overall, the types of SAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation during this trial were similar to those observed in the other lacosamide OLE trials, as well as in pivotal double-blind placebo-controlled lacosamide trials [5,7,8], suggesting that long-term treatment with lacosamide was not associated with a different safety profile from that established in the pivotal trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Lacosamide was well tolerated during this 8-year OLE trial, with 12.7% of patients discontinuing because of TEAEs, which lies within the range observed for other OLE studies of AEDs between 1 and 8 years of duration [9,10,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Overall, the types of SAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation during this trial were similar to those observed in the other lacosamide OLE trials, as well as in pivotal double-blind placebo-controlled lacosamide trials [5,7,8], suggesting that long-term treatment with lacosamide was not associated with a different safety profile from that established in the pivotal trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials of ESL 11, 12 were similar to the PROSPER study in design and study population and were followed by open‐label extension studies. In these extension studies, 69% 13 and 77% 14 of patients completed 1 year of open‐label treatment; discontinuations due to AEs were 4% and 11%, respectively. The seizure‐free rate among patients completing 1 year of open‐label therapy was 2.5% in the one study reporting this endpoint 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these extension studies, 69% 13 and 77% 14 of patients completed 1 year of open‐label treatment; discontinuations due to AEs were 4% and 11%, respectively. The seizure‐free rate among patients completing 1 year of open‐label therapy was 2.5% in the one study reporting this endpoint 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some side‐effects (diplopia, ataxia, abnormal coordination) were significantly more frequent in OXC‐treated patients compared to ESL and LCM. ESL‐related hyponatremia varies from 1.2% to 8.8% between different studies (Halasz et al., 2010; Hufnagel et al., 2013; Villanueva et al., 2014; Zaccara et al., 2013). The difference can be explained in terms of dosage used, population characteristics, and cut‐off used to define hyponatremia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%