2009
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/06-0069)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcome of the Lidcombe Program for Early Stuttering Intervention

Abstract: The treatment produced significant long-term changes in children's speech, even when administered by SLPs newly trained in the Lidcombe Program. Treatment results appear to be influenced by pretreatment stuttering severity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of stuttering from a mean of 7.6%SS before treatment to 0.1%SS after treatment was statistically significant with an effect size (Cohen’s d) of 2.9. The results were in line with those reported by Miller and Guitar [22] and Jones et al [23]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reduction of stuttering from a mean of 7.6%SS before treatment to 0.1%SS after treatment was statistically significant with an effect size (Cohen’s d) of 2.9. The results were in line with those reported by Miller and Guitar [22] and Jones et al [23]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The reported median number of clinic visits at stage 1 ranges from 11 to 17 [17,18,20,22]. Factors predicting treatment time have been investigated by Jones et al [17] in a retrospective study, where 250 children were placed on a maintenance program after achieving 0.0 or close to 0.0%SS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though SSI-3 is a measure of severity of stuttering rather than a way of differentiating between fluent speakers and speakers who stutter, it has been used in a similar manner in other studies (Arnold et al, 2005;Davis et al, 2007). Riley's instrument is thought to provide a more complete analysis than that which is provided by percentage of stuttered syllables, which is a measure of stuttering frequency only (Miller & Guitar, 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%