2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcome after highly advanced single-dose or fractionated radiotherapy in patients with vestibular schwannomas – Pooled results from 3 large German centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(125 reference statements)
6
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27 A recent German study evaluated the long term clinical outcome in 451 VS treated with SRS (n = 169, median dose 13 Gy) or FSRT (n = 291, 57.6 Gy in median single doses of 1.8 Gy). 28 After a median follow-up of 67 months, local control rate was 97% at 36 months, 95% at 60 months, and 94% at 120 months, with no difference between FSRT and SRS (p = 0.39). Loss of useful hearing was observed in 14% of the FSRT group and in 16% of the SRS group.…”
Section: Srs and Fsrt: Compared Schedulesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 A recent German study evaluated the long term clinical outcome in 451 VS treated with SRS (n = 169, median dose 13 Gy) or FSRT (n = 291, 57.6 Gy in median single doses of 1.8 Gy). 28 After a median follow-up of 67 months, local control rate was 97% at 36 months, 95% at 60 months, and 94% at 120 months, with no difference between FSRT and SRS (p = 0.39). Loss of useful hearing was observed in 14% of the FSRT group and in 16% of the SRS group.…”
Section: Srs and Fsrt: Compared Schedulesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…28,40,42 Preservation of serviceable hearing is reported to be higher after radiotherapy (30-98%) 13,24,28 than after surgery (30-50%). 28,40,42 In particular, the metanalysis from Maniakas et al 2 confirmed that the results of microsurgery and SRS are comparable in terms of local control but SRS can better preserve hearing function and a systematic review of controlled studies showed that SRS for VS of less than 3 cm in diameter can be the treatment of choice. 5 A recent long-term study confirmed the usefulness of the initial wait and see policy in the small VS and a better quality of life in the patients treated by SRS rather than microsurgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, 7 patients were treated by CyberKnife in three sessions of 6.5 Gy vs 39 by GammaKnife in a single session of 12 Gy and there was no difference between tumour control and hearing between these two treatments. A study of Combs et al found that local control of VS was 97% at 36 months, 95% at 60 months and 94% at 120 months with no difference between fractionated dose or single dose of RT ( P = 0.39). After RT, hearing preservation was observed in 85% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Single-dose stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) aiming to arrest tumor growth are the most commonly used noninvasive alternatives. In case series of patients suitable for radiosurgery/radiotherapy, the progression-free survival rates are comparable to those of case series of microsurgical resection of VS [14, 16, 30, 53]. Further, controlled studies and subsequent systematic reviews support the use of radiosurgery in VS patients eligible for both surgery and radiosurgery [23, 36, 38, 42, 43, 46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%