2019
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcome after coronary endarterectomy adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, CE had its priority when used adjunctively to CABG. Unlike early study results, researchers reported improved early and late outcomes after CE + CABG in several individual studies during last two decades [3,4,20], although most of the studies were restricted with observational design. Undoubtedly, these results might be attributed to the improvement in operative techniques and postoperative management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In these cases, CE had its priority when used adjunctively to CABG. Unlike early study results, researchers reported improved early and late outcomes after CE + CABG in several individual studies during last two decades [3,4,20], although most of the studies were restricted with observational design. Undoubtedly, these results might be attributed to the improvement in operative techniques and postoperative management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Notwithstanding, recent studies on CE have reported better short-term survival rates ranging from 1.8 to 4%, and lower MACCE rates. 17,18 A contemporary study from China 19 reported 30-day mortality rates at 1.4% and perioperative MI rates at 4.1% and a similar study in Germany 20 also reported 30-day mortality of 1.8% and periprocedural MI at 3.6%. In our cohort, the 30-day mortality rate was 2.5% and one-year all-cause mortality was 6.2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In despite of increasing early risks of morbidity and mortality after CE, the long-term outcomes of CABG+CE were not inferior to the CABG alone. A propensity matched cohorts study (1074 patients) comparing the long-term outcomes in patients undergone CABG with or without CE suggested no significant difference in terms of survival rate (65.8% versus 70.7%) and coronary reintervention (11.6% versus 12.7%) during10 years follow-up [ 16 ]. Furthermore, Schwann et al analyzed the late graft patency of 288 patients undergone CABG+CE, and found that the graft failure rate after CABG+CE vs CABG alone was no significant difference during 1-year follow-up [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%